Regional capacity building in the Carpathian Basin: Its actuality and relationship with the works of Gyula Horváth

Authors

  • Attila Fábián Department of International and Regional Economics, Sándor Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics, University of West Hungary
  • Balázs István Tóth Department of International and Regional Economics, Sándor Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics, University of West Hungary
  • Nikolett Fazekas István Széchenyi Management and Organisation Sciences Doctoral School, University of West Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.30.4.2835

Keywords:

regional capacity building, measuring regional capacities, regional resilience, Carpathian Basin, Gyula Horváth

Abstract

Various aspects of ‘regional capacity development’ and ‘regional capacity building’ have gained considerable attention in recent years among scholars in regional science. The approach became popular due to regional adaptation of endogenous growth theory and the emergence of concepts related to social well-being. In the past few decades, in-depth analyses explored and analyzed the features and elements of regional capacity building, such as social capital, knowledge infrastructure, effective territorial leadership, self-governance and selfmanagement, collaborative advantage and regional resilience.

Our aim with this work is to throw light on some of the underlying aspects of regional capacity building, to demonstrate the topic’s actuality, and to discuss its relationship with the views and works of Gyula Horváth. We present the most significant features and processes that determine the regional development in the Carpathian Basin and we also highlight some negative tendencies related to capacity building, e.g. the loss of regional functions, the conservation of territorial structure and the shortcomings concerning the regional institutional background.

In a further section, we discuss the main dilemmas and opportunities of capacity building methodology. Both in a general sense and in terms of the regional development in the Carpathian Basin, we argue for an increased focus on the nature of capacity building elements. For instance, we stress that scientist should stop relying on the quantification of social capital because its essence is not defined by unevenness but by the unique and incomparable attributes available in each territory.

Finally, we provide a few ‘regional capacity building’ suggestions for future research agendas by highlighting its relation to regional resilience. The article concludes with an emphasis on the global financial crisis in order to explore the features of capacity development to re-engineer regions.

Author Biographies

Attila Fábián , Department of International and Regional Economics, Sándor Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics, University of West Hungary

associate professor

Balázs István Tóth , Department of International and Regional Economics, Sándor Lámfalussy Faculty of Economics, University of West Hungary

assistant professor

Nikolett Fazekas , István Széchenyi Management and Organisation Sciences Doctoral School, University of West Hungary

PhD student

Downloads

Published

2016-11-22

How to Cite

Fábián, A., Tóth, B. I. and Fazekas, N. (2016) “Regional capacity building in the Carpathian Basin: Its actuality and relationship with the works of Gyula Horváth”, Tér és Társadalom, 30(4), pp. 129–138. doi: 10.17649/TET.30.4.2835.

Issue

Section

Articles