Discussion Papers 1993. 
Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes 29-36. p.
SYSTEMIC CHANGE AND POTENTIAL TRENDS 
29 
SYSTEMIC CHANGE AND POTENTIAL TRENDS 
OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN HUNGARY 
LASZLO FARAGO 
Hungary's silent revolution is smashing up the institutions of the monolithic party 
state without shocking the society and is in the process of reinstating civil society as it has 
been expected. The initial steps have already been taken towards the equality of the differ-
ent forms of ownership and the establishment of a quasi market economy based on free 
enterprise. 
The coalition led by the Hungarian Democratic Forum intends to modernize Hunga-
rian economy  in a centralized way t  and make it competitive by allowing, at the same 
time, the restoration of the nation's traditions to their old splendour. This twofold objec-
tive cannot be realized without conflicts. On the one hand, Hungarian culture is viewed as 
it was some four to six decades ago, unchanged. On the other hand, certain elements of 
modernization, like mass production for the world market, automation, the use of robots 
etc. are of a cosmopolitan character and therefore work against historic traditions. Mod-
ernization requires constant mobility, the maintenance of adaptability, which may conflict 
with the "popular" and utopian aspirations. 
The Alliance of Free Democrats  2 the strongest opposition party does not consider a 

specific Hungarian solution feasible but on the basis of Central and South American 
examples refuse a "middle-of-the-road" solution as well. In a simplified way their opinion 
is that our only possibility is to follow the pattern of the well proved (?) state capitalist 
system. 
The misconceived development policy and the subsequent crisis of the Soviet-type 
socio-economic systems have strengthened some of the regional conflicts and bequeathed 
us some new sources of social-regional tension. All political forces agree that  the key 
issue of transition is the modernization of the economy,  
the stimulation of efficient 
activities and the elimination of loss-producing activities. Restructuring started in the 
1980s and forced us to realize not only the existence of the backward areas but also that 
of the obsolete industrial regions. Evidence suggests that at the beginning of social-econ-
omic modernization, with the increase of monetary regulation,  regional interests lose 
importance,  
therefore a shift towards democracy is temporarily unfavourable for regional 
equalization. Researchers specializing in regional studies must warn that the more liberal 
market mechanisms and the lack of a suitable regional policy and an institutional system 
may lead to the increase of regional tensions and these, in turn, may hinder the transition 
itself. A kind of policy that takes into consideration regional identity and local interests 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
30 
LASZLO FARAGO 
can enhance the reform process and release new forces supporting development for a 
more efficient satisfaction of local interests. 
TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENDEAVOURS AND THEIR 
LIMITATIONS 
The government expects that an increased economic growth will stabilize the new 
order. The best way to achieve quick results, i.e. to produce more output or profit, seems 
to be the investment of more and more capital into the economy. 
Capital accumulation is limited by the backwardness of the economy and the re-
quirement to maintain the present level of consumption. Further accumulation of debts is 
not an acceptable solution, either. 
Hungary, like all the other Eastern European countries, including the Soviet Union, 
hopes to develop its economy with foreign help. In my opinion, however, none of the 
former socialist countries will be given the amount of foreign capital that would be suffi-
cient to help out their national economies. The USA has no interest in a rapid progress of 
Eastern European countries.  3  Although the USA shows a positive attitude towards the 
disintegration of the Eastern bloc it cannot be expected to encourage those processes in 
Eastern Europe that, in the long run, will contribute to the strengthening of Western Eu-
rope considering that its own position in the world market is weakening. As to the interest 
of the EC countries in Eastern European changes we can say that they merely concentrate 
on avoiding the potential disadvantages of these processes. Germany is aware of the im-
portance and chances (!) of Central and Eastern Europe but the unification of Germany 
and the protection of the national currency may require that resources be invested in their 
own country. 
There has been a great interest on the part of foreign private capital, which, however, 
is channelled to more dynamically developing regions, world centres by the requirements 
of profit maximization and increase in productivity. Political instability  4 red tape, lack of 

information, low level of efficiency caused by our backward infrastructure and unwilling-
ness to co-operate make it very difficult for our economy to attract capital. Capital invest-
ments that are made in Hungary in spite of the above drawbacks, are concentrated in areas 
where profit expectations are high, therefore the lack of regional preferences allows capi-
tal to flow into areas that are more developed already. In the case of really mobile 
international capital we must take into account the possibility that it will not remain in 
Hungary if investments become more profitable or safer elsewhere. 
Hungary, like all the socialist countries in general, fell behind in technological devel-
opment. Therefore, the advance of our economy strongly depends on how fast high tech-
nology can be introduced. There is, however, no hope for spectacular changes in this field 
either. Besides the measures of discrimination (e.g. the Cocom list) it is primarily the low 
level of the infrastructure, the obsolete structure of labour and the general attitude towards 
work that hinder the adoptation of modern technologies. In order to keep our leading po-
sition we would have to compete with highly developed firms of considerable capital, or 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
SYSTEMIC CHANGE AND POTENTIAL TRENDS 
31 
if we were just to follow them, we would have to compete with the low wages of the Far 
East. 
It is primarily the key industries and those which have a central location (in a town) 
that have a chance to renew their technologies. Consequently, the countryside will 
become even more backward. Even if some high-tech companies were established in less 
developed socio-economic settings we still would have to take the risk that they may 
remain isolated and could not have the multiplying effect required. Their impact on the 
structure of local society and social mobility will not always be favourable. High-tech 
requires highly qualified white collar workers and low-skilled blue collar workers. Top 
managers and technocrats usually come from "above" together with the new firm and 
technology, while the middle layer of the local society (technicians, skilled workers) will 
have difficulty finding jobs. This impedes social mobility and the communities living on 
the periphery remain defenceless. 
In the present situation when foreign capital cannot be expected to be invested in sig-
nificant amounts and there is over-employment in the economy, the most reasonable way 
of increasing efficiency is the redeployment of resources. Switching over to the produc-
tion of high-productivity goods would require the introduction of new technologies, 
which, in turn, would bring about the above described difficulties. A further dilemma re-
lated to this change is that transition will temporarily increase unemployment before it can 
be stabilized at a level which is in conformity with the development of the economy. Since 
the mobility of the population is relatively low, the spatial changes in the economy can be 
followed by the movement of labour only with delay. All this may lead to dangerous 
regional tensions. 
All political forces count on the entrepreneurship and shavings of the population. I 
also believe that this is the basis on which our hopes can be built and better results 
achieved 5  but an increased "freedom from" something does not necessarily lead to "free-
dom to do" something. In the last forty years the paternalistic party state based on the 
communist ideology made serious efforts to wipe out entrepreneurship. This is the reason 
why it is not enough just to allow the operation of private business and create the political 
and legal conditions of a market economy. The prestige of the private enterprise should 
also be restored, together with the establishment of new institutions and mechanisms that 
promote the founding of new enterprises and serve them during their operation. Fortunate-
ly there are more and more institutes offering training for entrepreneurs and managers, or 
management of investments and ventures. Yet, we have to face adverse attitudes and even 
fears. The government has developed a programme to activate business, however, it seems 
to have the intention of restricting real market-like operation to small business, trade, 
catering and services. The government wants to control transition and perhaps further 
operation centrally, which can be realized through the institutions staffed with active 
members of the Hungarian Democratic Forum. They think in terms of a reform directed 
"from above", structures and a hierarchic system based on good or bad assumptions. This 
does not make it possible for those who have just started to re-enforce their own interests 
to catch up with the others. 
Legislation first allowed the establishment of new, private or joint stock enterprises in 
January, 1982. Since then thousands of new enterprises have been started mainly in the 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
32 
LASZLO FARAGO 
capital and larger towns and follow the patterns of a strong regional hierarchy. As to the 
level of the settlements or regions it can be stated that these businesses are concentrated 
in the developed areas thus strengthening the tendency of regional differentiation. 
Consequently, structural decentralization did not go together with regional decentraliza-
tion. 
Privatization beginning in trade and the catering industry again opens up new oppor-
tunities only for entrepreneurs living in towns. The transformation of the large and me-
dium-size companies will allot property primarily to the former managers and perhaps the 
workers. The privatization of land or its return to the previous owners will be favourable 
for those who live in more developed rural areas with higher quality soil and good loca-
tion. The profit to be gained by private entrepreneurs or local governments from property 
in economically backward areas is expected to be much lower, therefore the relative back-
wardness of these regions will increase. Consequently, privatization has widened the gap 
between developed and backward regions: in towns it has strengthened potentials for in-
novation, new enterprises, the development of the infrastructure, while backward areas 
may have to give up hope of any development. 
In a dynamic economy the structural crisis of the formerly developed industrial re-
gions is a constantly recurring phenomenon. What differentiates a healthy economy from 
a static economy, unable to renew itself is not the fact that in a healthy economy com-
panies cannot go bankrupt or people do not end up unemployed but rather the fact that the 
means of production released in this way are reinvested into production in a relatively 
short time. In countries where it does not happen automatically even in the long run, the 
local, regional and national governments have to intervene in order to redress the econ-
omic and regional equilibrium. 
In the case of Hungary the previous practices of development and covering up of 
emergency situations (may) lead to very deep regional crises. These sometimes require 
individual solutions. At present there is a crisis management programme in Hungary that 
has been developed with foreign participation.  6  In these crisis regions job-creating invest-
ments may enjoy tax reduction. The establishment of retraining centres and continuous 
education has started. A measure to relieve individual hardship is the introduction of a 
"protective net of social benefits" (mobility fund, redundancy money, early retirement 
etc.). 
Nowadays social tension is stronger and more evident in regions which have gotten 
into a crisis than in those that are backward and suffer from several disadvantages. At the 
same time, the present crisis management programmes produce better results in the for-
mer than in the development of the backward, rural regions. The premises of the firms that 
. have been closed down cannot be moved, the mobility of population is very low, the exist-
ing infrastructure can reduce the costs of a new investment. In the depressed areas better 
infrastructure, more advantageous demographic and qualification structure of labour pro-
vide more favourable conditions for new enterprises. 
Handicapped rural areas will get into a more difficult situation with the increase of 
market forces, since they do not possess any local resources for revival. The social and 
economic pauperization of these regions is the consequence of the former policies and 
practices of development, therefore it is the duty of the society to help those who live 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
SYSTEMIC CHANGE AND POTENTIAL TRENDS 
33 
there. The only way to do so would be a positive discrimination. Besides the overall lack 
of resources the situation is worsened by the possibility that the measures required in these 
regions may be in conflict with some macro-trends of the transition, such as the elimina-
tion of exceptional deals, the reduction of subsidies, the requirement of economic effi-
ciency and the introduction of the market economy in general. International experiences 
have shown that at the time of recession governments tend to give priority to efficiency as 
opposed to equity in regional development. Returns on investments in backward areas are 
slower, less efficient therefore, in the short  run,  this slows down the national renewal 
programme, and the government will not be interested in such investments. 
In conclusion we can say that the trends taking shape at present will lead to further 
social and regional differentiation. It is more than reasonable to examine whether in this 
situation we should increase  the  mobility of the population and make the decline more 
tolerable or hope to discover a kind of development strategy that may provide a realistic 
alternative besides or instead of the programmes that create such anomalous situations. 
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BASED ON LOCAL-COMMUNITY 
INITIATIVE 
The course of development dictated by the developed Western countries could be fol-
lowed by Hungary only if some miracle (so far unrecognized objective trend) enabled us 
to catch up with them to such an extent that we could produce these strategies of develop-
ment and benefit from them. Unfortunately our chances to achieve this are slight. In the 
case of Hungary "modernization from external sources" is only a substitute for organic 
development and this is far from the optimum condition. Even if the justification of the 
centrally initiated (region) development efforts is accepted we must point out that these 
efforts will not have the same effects and not at the same time on the individual regions 
and settlement types. There will always be some regionally separated communities that 
are either avoided by the macro-trends of development or unfavourably affected by them. 
In a democratic society ethnic, regional or local communities are not forced to passively 
tolerate these unfavourable effects; on the contrary, they can take an active part in chang-
ing their lot. 
There are several theories that offer a more equitable, well-balanced regional develop-
ment (community, self-reliant, endogeneous, self-directed etc. development).  8  A com-
mon, just emerging principle of the "alternative" development concepts is called  post-
modernism. 
9  Theories which have accepted this principle or contributed to it  apparently 
deny modernization,  the previous forms of development, actually go  beyond it.  Most 
economists today have realized that development is not identical to economic growth but 
rather a complex human-social phenomenon. Economic growth can mean at the same 
time development for a community only if it contributes to a progressive change in the 
socio-economic structure, increases opportunities open to the population and improves 
living conditions. According to this concept of development, increase of production flex-
ibility can take place not only within production itself but it can make people or their 
different communities more adaptable, open and therefore more competitive. 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
34 
LASZLO FARAGO 
The common starting point for the alternative development strategies is the refusal of 
modernization based on the logic of (international) capital. The importance of space (re-
gions) within the social and economic relations is increasing. Some borders lose import-
ance, while our ethnic, cultural and living environment becomes important again. For 
some time the "Iron Curtain" could prevent us from good or bad influences, protect us 
from the development produced and dictated by the West. Our task today is to enable 
individuals and their communities to protect themselves from harmful effects, and give 
them a good chance to acquire benefits. For the first time in our thousand-year history we 
should try to shape the trends of "development from below". Development initiated lo-
cally on the regional level can explore the specific resources more efficiently, it can also 
utilize these resources according to the real interest of the local population and fill those 
economic gaps that are left by macro- or micro-economic policy. By creating new jobs it 
can reduce both national and regional unemployment. It can relieve the burdens of the 
central budget thereby reducing withdrawal of resources, which, in turn, can improve the 
efficiency of the utilization of profits and incomes gained. 
Legislation that is under way now will (hopefully) allow local governments controlled 
by the political parties, organizations for the safeguarding of people's interests, religious 
and other communities to act independently in the interest of the regional and local com-
munities. There is no guarantee that this arrangement will lead to a more even regional 
development in the traditional meaning of the term but will certainly mean the beginning 
of a more efficient and equitable stage of development. 
SUMMARY (ANSWER TO THE HUNGARIAN DEMOCRATIC FORUM 
— ALLIANCE OF FREE DEMOCRATS DILEMMA MENTIONED 
IN THE INTRODUCTION) 
The task to be solved in Hungary today is not to mummify the ancient, cultural-na-
tional virtues but to find a path of development that can help us preserve community 
values, national identity and maintain the balance of the environment. Traditionalism may 
be suitable for preserving our national culture but on the basis of post-modernism we can 
conclude that development is strongly dependent on our ability to integrate the values of 
many different cultures without becoming victims to "cultural imperialism" and having 
our preferences internationalized. It would be foolish on our part to reject modernization 
in general and to deny ourselves the achievements of the affluent society. The kind of 
development strategy which prefers local initiatives to a central development policy built 
on a single doctrine, which tolerates differences and is in a well-balanced relationship 
with nature,  does not necessarily mean a specific Hungarian path.  The hedonistic con-
sumers, disgusted with the affluent society, the desperate survivors in the Third World and 
all those who have just come to the daylight from the darkness of state socialism all are 
looking for something else. 
The megatrends I  outlined by NAISHIT (1987), who used primarily the American 
experiences, are decisive elements of the changes that are taking place in our days. These 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
SYSTEMIC CHANGE AND POTENTIAL TRENDS 
35 
or development initiated locally and the related European experiences (BASSAND, M. 
ed. 1986) all point in this direction. 
NOTES 
.  . 
Similarly to the Third World countries, the former socialist countries often seem to believe that modernization 
means the repetition of the Western European and North American trend of development in the given circumstan-
ces. This goes together with the rejection of traditional life patterns and customs, the formation of new institu-
tions and a new social elite. Modernization "frees" man from the traditional regional, racial, sexual etc. con-
straints. 
2  If the present coalition government fails, the Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ) has the best chances to form 
a government. 
3  The USA once again misses the opportunity to increase its influence in Eastern Europe. Their reluctance to 
invest capital here will slow down transformation in Hungary and opens the market to Western European and 
(perhaps) Far-Eastern capital. 
4  It is not yet known to what extent the government intends to involve foreign capital into privatization, the 
renewal of the economy. The Hungarian Democratic Forum has stated that they would primarily support the 
emergence of Hungarian small and medium-size businesses (properties), which will take a long time. The regu-
lation that is in force now and legislation concerning privatization do not favour foreign investors. 
5  This view is justified by the fact that in the early 1980s all the surplus product in Hungary was produced by 
the newly established or the already existing private businesses. 
6  For example, a concept and action plan for the regional development of Northern Hungary (the region of Ozd) 
was developed in 1989. 
These advantages are, of course, only relative as compared to the backward rural areas and not to those settle-
ments that enjoyed an even development throughout history. 
Not all of these are applicable in every region. The self-directed strategies that rely on inner development and 
promise a "modern" type of development with traditional means, can be applied only in regions that are already 
developed or fall within the macro-trend of development. (FRIEDMAN, J. 1986. In: BASSAND, M. et  al. eds. 
1986) 
9  At present it is difficult to define the real meaning of this alternative stand-point. This concept, in contrast with 
the former criticism of modernization, justifies its existence and name by not only analyzing the crisis of mod-
ernism but also by offering solutions. It suggests replacing egoism with solidarity, hedonism with temperance, 
and completing rationalism with intuition and meditation. It states that further development cannot be the result 
of specialization, the increase of complexity and the growth of the producing units but of differentiation and 
variety. This concept refuses any kind of dominant doctrine or totalitarian ideology. The source of development 
is the multitude of languages and cultures, in the broadest meaning. 
10  These megatrends  are: the transformation of the industrial society into the society of information; decentral-
ization; self-reliance instead of institutional support; increase of democracy based on participation; the replace-
ment of hierarchic structures with the network of complementary units etc. 
REFERENCES 
BASSAND, M. BRUGGER, et al. eds. 1986: Self-Reliant Development in Europe: Theory, Problems, Actions 
— Aldershot, Gower P. C. 
BOROCZ, J. 1990: A posztmodern tarsadalomtudorniny (The postmodern social science) — Valbsig, 6, 
pp•38-48. 

Faragó, László: Systemic Change and Potential Trends of Regional Development in Hungary. 
In: Spatial Research and the Social-Political Changes.  Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 
1993. 29–36. p. Discussion Papers. Special
36 
LASZLO FARAGO 
FARAGO, L. 1990: A helyi gazdas'agfejleszt6s elmelete (The theory of local economic development) — Gaz-
dasAgi F6mm, 2, pp.44-55. 
NAISBITT, J. 1987: Megatrendek. Tfz tij irAnyzat, amelyek atalakftjak elettlnket (Megatrends. Ten New Direc-
tions Transforming Our Lives) — Budapest, OMIKK 
SHAFFER, R. 1988: Community Economics. Economic Structure and Change in Smaller Communities —
Ames, Iowa State University