Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County 
CENTRE FOR REGIONAL STUDIES 
OF HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
DISCUSSION PAPERS 
No .4 
INVESTIGATIONS OF SOCIAL 
INFRASTRUCTURE IN RURAL 
SETTLEMENTS OF BORSOD COUNTY 
by 
SIKOS T., Tamers 
Series editor: HRUBI, Laszlo 
Pecs 
1987 

Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County 
Translation by  Agnes  Spollar, Centre for Regional 
Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1251 
Budapest 11. P.O.Box 48. 
Revision by Prof. Keith Grime, University of Salford, 
Department of Geography, Salford M5 4WT, England, and 
Prof. William H. BLrentsen, University of Connecticut, 
Department of Geography, 354 Mansfield Road, Storrs, 
Ct. 06268, U.S.A. 
ISSN 0238 - 2008 

Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County 
Contents 
Introduction 
Description of tasks of research and compilation 

of the data bank 
The results and the interpretation of the contents 
of factor analysis 
1 1 
Types of social infrastructure in rural settlements 
20 
of Borsod County 
38 
Conclusion 
40 
Bibliography 
45 
Appendix 




Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

Introduction 
In the 40 years since World War II the nation-
al economy of Hungary has undergone a significant 
aocio-economic transformation r3sulting from the 
building of socialism. In the recent phase of devel-
opment, the main task of society and social policy 
has been to reveal the disproportions in the devel-
opment of individual regions; and to highlight the 
variations in the living standards between the urban 
and rural populations. Current regional policy pays 
special attention to  the development of infrastruc-
ture and settlement network. The inadequate develop-
ment of social infrastructure and communication net-
works in rural settlements leads to undesirable phe-
nomena such as outmigration ; distortion of the de-
mographic structure of rural settlements; shortage in 
the supply of agricultural labour; and the emergence 
of depressed  regions. All  these facts inspired the 
present author to  examine the social  infrastructure 
in rural settlements. 
The basic aim of research was to investigate 
the differences among regional levels of social in-
frastructure in rural settlements of Borsod-Abadj-
Zemplen County (North-Hungary) that has been  chosen 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

for the following purposes. Between 1979 and 1981, 
the typology of rural settlements of Hungary was 
elaborated by BELUSZKY, Pal and SIKOS, T. Lamas. The 
results of these researches indicated that almost all 
types of rural settlements which exist in the country 
as a whole can be found in Borsod County, too. Since 
social infrastructure is one of the most important 
elements of rural settlement development, this typo-
logy seems proper to be worked out for Borsod County. 
The research was conducted along the following 
lines: 
1. A typology of rural settlements for Borsod County 
was prepared using a new methodological approach which 
differed from earlier ones both in the composition of 
indices and in the mathematical-statistical methods 
which were adopted. 
2. A typology was developed using factor- and cluster 
analyses. 
3. An information data bank including information on 
the social infrastructure of rural settlements of 
Borsod County was established. 
4. Functional connections which exist between rural 
settlements and those indices relating to the develop-
ment of certain elements of social infrastructure were 
explored. 
5. On the basis of factor analysis the elements and 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

the extent of their contribution to shaping social 
infrastructure in rural settlements of Borsod 
County were distinguished. 
6. Applying cluster analysis, the typology of social 
infrastructure in rural settlements of Borsod 
County was prepared. 
A great number of studies by Hungarian re-
searchers have been published recently investigat-
ing primarily public administration and economic 
problems, and the stratification and migration of 
population in rural settlements. In these studies 
attention has been given to the differentiation in 
regional development levels and the typology of ru-
ral settlements of Hungary, but a complex economic 
and economic-geographical research into the typo-
logy of social infrastructure of rural settlements 
has not yet been carried out. 
The statistical data base for 1980 as well 
as data collected by the Council of Borsod-Abatij-
Zemplen County contributed largely to the present 
investigation. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

Description of  tasks of research and compilation of 
the data bank 
Tasks of research: 
1. Determination of scope of elements as well 
as that of the extent to which they shape the devel-
opment of social infrastructure of rural settlements. 
2. Elaboration of the typology of social infra-
structure of rural settlements. 
The various stages and characteristics of this 
work can be traced in  Figure 1. 
 In the analysis, 26 
indices were applied to 352 rural settlements of 
Borsod County. The 26 indices of the investigation 
were classified, to a certain extent conditionally, 
into S groups (A, B, C, D, and E) each presenting a 
definite aspect of social infrastructure investiga-
tions. The scope and list of indices applied in the 
analyses is presented below (subgequently, county 
mean values and standard deviations are put into 
brackets). 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

A. The basic institutions and their level in rural 
settlements 

2
1. Size of retail trade shops in 1979, m
(364 m

2
631 m
); 
2. The value of consumer goods' turnover in retail 
trade in 1979 per capita (3,001 Ft; 4,584 Ft); 
3.
Instituti_on network of basic services in 1980 
(12.1 scores; 8.0 scores); 
4. The number of small scale industrial workers in 
1979 (11.3 persons; 15.9 persons); 
5.
5. The capacity of nurseries per 100 children of 
0-3 years in 1980 (1.3 persons; 5.9 persons); 
6. The capacity of kindergartens per 100 children of 
3-6 years in 1980 (33.5 persons; 44.0 persons); 
7. The number of consulting hours in 1979 (0.9 hrs.; 
3.9 hrs.); 
B.  Amenities  of flats and basic services in rural 
settlements 
8. Proportion of flats built after 1945 as a propor-
tion of all flats in 1980 (52.5 per cent; 15.9 
per cent); 
9. Proportion of flats built between 1970 and 1979 
as a proportion of all flats in 1980 (13.9 per 
cent; 8.5 per cent); 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

10. Proportion of one-room flats to all flats in 
1980 (26.5 per cent; 10.2 per cent); 
11. Proportion of residential buildings having more 
than one storey to all residential buildings 
in 1980 (0.3 per cent; 1.7 per cent); 
12. Number of flats with bathrooms or lavatories per 
100 flats in 1980 (26.4 per cent; 15.3 per cent); 
C. Provision of rural communities with public util-
ities 
13. Proportion of flats supplied with electricity 
to all flats in 1980 (96.9 per cent; 2.9 p.c.); 
14. Proportion of flats with water to all flats in 
1980 (21.7 per cent; 14.9 per cent); 
15. Proportion of flats supplied with gas to all 
flats in 1980 (53.3 per cent; 14.8 per cent); 
16. Proportion of flats connected to a sewage system 
to all flats in 1980 (23.9 per cent; 15.4 p.c.); 
17. Electricity consumption per capita in 1980 
(kw-hrs.) (805.8 kw-hrs.; 281.2 kw-hrs.); 
D. Transport characteristics of rural communities  
18. Transport network in 1980 (4.5 scores; 2.5 scores); 
19. Accessibility (in minutes) to nearest town  or  vil-
lage (district seat) by most rapid means of trans-
port in 1980 (40.3 min.; 27.4 minutes); 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

20.
Frequency of means of transport leaving for towns 
in 1980 (81.2/week; 89.2/week); 
E.  Educational and cultural characteristics of  
rural communities  
21.
Number of school rooms in elementary schools in 
1979 (4.8 school rooms; 6.1 school rooms); 
22.
Number of pupils in elementary schools in 1979 
(153 pupils; 228 pupils).; 
23. Number of students in secondary schools in 1979 
(13  students; 147 students); 
24.
Proportion of those 15 years or older finishing 
8 years of elementary school in 1980  (52.0  per 
cent;  8.9 per cent); 
25.
Proportion of those 18 years or older finishing 
secondary school in 1980 (9.6 per cent; 4.3 per 
cent); 
26.
Number of libraries in 1979 (3,968.4 libraries; 
6,784.2 libraries). 
During the compilation of indices, it was most 
difficult to determine the values of synthetic indices. 
A similar problem occurred in the determination of 
the value of index 3 (which gives a complex evaluation 
of the development level of social infrastructure 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

in rural settlements). As is well-known, in similar 
cases the methods of scoring are frequently used. 
The application of the latter method requires two 
questions to be answered: 
1. the precise delimitation of tne range of scoring 
elements; 
2.
the determination of scores. 
The scores and basic elements of service  that 
provide the complex evaluation of the development 
level of social infrastructure are presented below. 
The number of basic elements is 21. These elements 
were allotted the next scores: retail trade shops 
selling consumer goods:2; depots selling building 
material and fuel:1; market-place:1; restaurant:1; 
postoffice:1; bank:1; ambulance station:2; consult-
ing room:1;  dentist's room:1; kindergarten:1; nur-
sery:1; cultural centre, club:1; home  for elderly 
people:1; social care nurse:1; drug-store:1; cinema: 
1; village library:1; elementary school (with 
classes for 1-4 years):1; elementary school (with 
classes for 5-8 years):2; number of small scale in-
dustrial workers: 4-10 people:1; 11-20:2; 21 or 
more:3. 
As is clearly shown, the majority of the basic 
elements of the service sector were score11. It fol- 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
10 
lows from incomparable elements as post-office, drug-
store, library, market-place, etc. that are unable 
to reconcile. In principle, the existence of each 
element would be of primary importance in rural set-
tlements. Scoring is based on a double system: 
1 - indicates the presence, while 
0 - indicates the absence of a given element 
of basic service. The higher the level of service 
of a rural settlement, the higher are the scores of 
complex indices of social infrastructure. It should 
be noted that similar scores of social infrastructural 
development may have a widely differring structure 
of basic elements. There are naturally a few basic 
elements which are only provided in larger centres 
and are not worth operating in all settlements e.g. 
secondary  schools,  grammar  schools,  retail trade 
shops  selling consumer goods, or ambulance stations. 
This group of basic elements was scored 2. 
The complex evaluation of the development level 
of social infrastructure in rural settlements--as 
was presented--included also the scores referring 
to the administrative division of settlements: centre 
of  a  district: 5; large village with council: 3; vil-
lage with council: 2; village without council: 0; 
headquarters of agricultural state farms: 3; centre 
of a cooperative ("AFESZ"): 2. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
11 
La the opinion of the author of the paper, those 
settlements having administrative-management, and 
productive-trade- and distribution functions should 
have a car repair station, sewage purification 
plant, telephone centre, and other public utility 
institutions. Information in the data bank enabled 
a preliminary examination of the rural service sec-
tor to be-made. The results of this investigation 
provided the basis for factor analysis. In the 
paper, a few draft maps of the area and the trans-
port network of Borsod County  will  be presented 
which may contribute to the understanding of the 
other parts of the material  (Figures 2 and  3). 
 
The results and the interpretation of the 
contents of factor analysis  
The 26 indices mentioned earlier were used 
in the procedure of factor analysis. In the course 
of investigations, principal-components analysis 
was accomplished  using different eigenvalues (0.6, 
0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0). Out of the variables, that of 
0.8 eigenvalue represents best the factors of 
basic differences; therefore, further analyses 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
12 
were based on it. The variable of 0.8 eigenvalue 
contains 8 factors accounting for 78.26 per  cent  of 
the original information. It is worth mentioning 
that the first 4 factors account for 64.05 per cent 
of the deviation square. The contents of these fac-
tors can be'interpreted as follows: 
F l = development level of basic elements 
of service; 
F
= rate of house building and amenities 
2
of flats; 
F
= transport characteristics; 
3
F 4 = unfavourable conditions of provision 
of rural communities with public util-
ities. 
Based on  eigenvalue 11.2, factor F
accounts 

for  43.13  per  cent  of  the  deviation  square. 
Indices  that  comprise  factor  F 1 
factorweights 
 
22.  Number of  pupils  in  elementary 
schools 
0.901 

1.  Size  of  retail  trade  shops,  m
0.886 
21.  Number of  school  rooms  in 
elementary  schools 
0.878 
4.  Number of  small  scale  industrial 
workers 
0.859 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
13 
26.  Number  of  libraries 
0.838 
3.  Institution network  of  basic 
services 
0.751 
7.  Number  of  consulting  hours  - 
0.665 
2.  Value  of  consumer  goods'  turn- 
over  in  retail  trade  per  capita 
0.605 
18.  Transport  network 
0.478 
Among the indices of factor F 1 , there is a 
real connectionship which is clear logically and 
can be measured by means of mathematics. The strong-
est correlation (0.9) can be observed between indic-
es 22 and 21, while the weakest correlation exists 
between indices 7 and 18; the existing connections 
do not require special explanations. There is a 
similarly trivial connection between index 3 and the 
remaining indices. The strong correlation between 
indices 1 and 21, 1 and 22, 1 and 26, 1 and 7, as 
well as 21 and 26 prove that rural settlements of 
the county possess with a number of basic elements 
of service such as shops, elementary schools, libra-
ries, consulting rooms etc. Nevertheless, a mean 
correlation of indices 1 and 2 indicates that most 
shops cannot offer a great choice of consumer goods, 
so necessary items have to be purchased mainly in 
towns or rural centres of medium-level. Index 18 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
14 
(transport network) correlates with indices 22, 1, 
2t, 26, and 2 at an average level, while it is weak-
ly connected  to  indices 2 and 7. 
Regional distribution of factor scores shows 
that rural settlements that are allotted high scores 
(8.818-2.781 and 2.780-1.001) are dispersed settle-
ments in the county; they constitute a contiguous 
belt only in the valley of Saj6, Badva, and Hern6d 
rivers. Low faCtor scores are characteristic of 
Hegykoz, Cserehat, Nort Borsod Karst and Mts. of 
Zemplen. 
Factor  F
accounts for 11.78 per cent of the 

deviation square  using 3.6 eigenvalue. 
Indices that comprise factor F 2 
factorweights  
12. Number of flats with bathrooms 
or lavatories per 100 flats 
0.868 
16. Proportion of flats connected to 
a sewage system to  all flats 
0.839 
14. Proportion of flats with water 
to  all flats 
0.821 
17. Electricity consumption per 
capita (kw-hrs.) 
0.784 
9. Proportion of flats built between 
1970-1979 as a proportion to all 
flats 
0.760 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
15 
24. Proportion of those 15 years or older 
finishing 8 years of elementary 
school 
0.754 
8. Proportion of flats built after 
1945 as a proportion of all flats 
0.684 
25. Proportion of those 18 years or 
older finishing secondary school 
0.681 
18. Transport network 
0.435 
Evidently, the highest correlation exists be-
tween indices 12 (number of flats with bathrooms or 
lavatories per 100 flats), 14 (proportion of flats 
with water to all flats), and 16 (proportion of 
flats connected to a sewage system). The above men-
tioned three indices show strong correlation (0.7) 
with index 17 (electricity consumption per capita). 
Because indices 12, 14, and 17 characterize the tech-
nical level and amenities of flats, it is evident 
that index 25 (proportion of those 18 years or 
older finishing secondary school) correlates strong-
ly (0.7) with indices 12, 14, and 16, while index 24 
(proportion of  those 15 years or  older finishing 
8 years of elementary school) shows an average cor-
relation (0.6) with indices 12, 14, 16, and 17. All 
in all, the facts described above strengthen the 
a priori hypothesis that correlation may exist be-
tween the dynamism of housing and the amenities of 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
16 
flats; moreover, between people finishing 8 years 
of elementary school or having medium-level qualifi-
cations and flats supplied with bathroom, water, 
electricity etc. 
A characteristic feature of regional distri-
bution of the factor scores in factor F
is that ex-

tremely high values can be found in the settlements 
of the Miskolc agglomeration, those of the industrial 
axis of Ozd and LeninvAros, and in the environs of 
HollOhiza and Pilhaza in the Hegykoz. The develop-
ment level of technological infrastructure is close-
ly connected to the spatial location of the industry 
of the county. Lower scores are allotted the agri-
cultural regions in Bodrogk8z, Mts. of Zemplen, 
"negyalja, CserehAt (excluding settlements laying at 
the fringe of the valley of SajO and HernAd rivers), 
in the Borsod Highplains which is traditionally a 
good agrarian region; only settlements that are ad-
jacent to the Sajo river can reach the average level 
where, however, industry makes its influence felt. 
There are also lower factor scores than the average 
in the majority of settlements of Harangod and the 
North Borsod Karst. 
The area of Ozd Highlands can be considered 
an averagely developed region having flats supplied 
with bathroom, water, electricity, etc. built in the 
1950s and 1960s. The majority of settlements are 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
17 
dormitary settlements of Ozd with good transport 
facilities. Only settlements of valley of Sajd river 
have higher scores than the average. 
Factor F
accounts for 4.71 per cent of the 

deviation square using 1.22 eigenvalue. 
Indices that comprise factor F
factorweights 
 

18. Transport network 
0.814 
19. Accessibility to nearest town or 
village (district seat) by most 
rapid means of transport 
-0.569 
20. Frequency of means of transport 
leaving for towns 
-0.436 
It  is beyond question  that factor F 3 
 is that 
of transport facilities. Weak and medium-level cor-
relation is characteristic of the inner correlations 
of the factor. The regional distribution of scores 
of factor F
shows that settlements with favourable 

transport facilities are situated next to or not far 
from the main roads, i.e. along the traditional 
radial major transport routes /Mez6kovesd-Miskolc-
Tornyosnemeti; Miskolc-Szerencs-Sitoraljadjhely; 
Miskolc-Kazincbarcika-Binreve-Ozd; Miskolc-Nyeklid-
hiza-Leninviros; Miskolc-Nyekladhaza-Mezocsit). Set- 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
18 
tlements having unfavourable transport facilities 
are mostly hamlets situated in the hilly and mountain-
ous regions or in long distances from transport 
corridors. 
It should be outlined that index 18 compris-
sing factor F
contributes also to factors F  and 


F 2 . Consequently, transport characteristics have a 
decisive role in the formation of differences among 
regional levels of settlement infrastructure. Re-
search has led to the conclusion that a medium-level 
correlation exists between factors F
and F 2,  as 

well as F
and F 3,  while factors F
and F
correlate 



substantially. 
High scores of factors F 1
F
and F
are char-



acteristic  of  rural settlements tending to become 
urban and industrial, as well as of settlements in 
the industrial axis of valley of Sajd river, and 
Miskolc agglomeration, of district seats, and of 
settlements having favourable transport character-
istics  (Figure  4). 
Highest scores of factors F 1 , 
F
and F
are characteristic of social infrastruc-


ture of Miskolc district. A similarly high level of 
social infrastructure is represented by settlements 
of districts of Mezeikovesd and Szerencs. Subsequent-
ly, settlements of district of MezOcsat possess the 
less favourable facilities while districts of Sator- 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional 
19 
Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
aljadjhely, Encs, and Edeleny are said to have the 
most unfavourable transport facilities. 
Factor F
accounts for 4.43 per cent of the 

deviation square using 1.14 eigenvalue. 
Indices that comprise factor F 4 
 
factorweights  
10. Proportion of one—room flats - to 
all flats 
0.800 
15. Proportion of flats supplied 
with gas to all flats 
—0.574 
13. Proportion of flats supplied 
with electricity to all flats 
—0.557 
Factor F
characterizes the unfavourable 

conditions of housing and communality. Regional 
distribution of factor scores points out that the 
lowest scores are given by 14.4 per cent of rural 
settlements of the county. These settlements are 
situated mainly in the Mts. of Blikk, North Borsod 
Karst, Cserehit, Mts. of Zempin, Hegykoz, and Bor-
sod Highplains. Settlements having high scores lie 
in Bodrogk8z, Harangod, Taktakoz, the Miskolc agg-
lomeration, the surroundings of Leninvdros, and in 
the valley of the Saja, Hof:Iva and Hernid rivers. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
20 
Types of social infrastructure in rural settlements  
of Borsod County  
Types of social infrastructure in rural set-
tlements of Borsod County were determined by the 
application of cluster analysis (using MacQueen al-
gorithm), and the results of factor analysis were 
also taken into account. In the course of calcula-
tions, multivariate analyses were completed. Final-
ly, a variable having 13 clusters was selected to 
constitute the basis for further investigations. 
This decision was made by giving priority to the 
purposes of the investigation (the desirable level 
of analysis), the practical aspects of application, 
the comparison of partial results of examination, 
the empirical  experience, and cluster analysis. 
All in all, a variable including 13 clusters 
was divided into I-V. main types and 9 subtypes which 
are presented in detail below and illustrated by 
Figure 5. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
21 
I. Social infrastructure in the initial stage of 
development  
This type of social infrastructure involves 
3 clusters: 11, 6, and 12, and approximately 40 % of 
rural settlements of Borsod County. Most settlements 
are situated in the North Borsod Karst, the Highlands 
of Cserehat and Zempldn, and Bodrogkoz; however, 
they happen to occur also in other, isolated, regions 
of the county. Table I registers a permanent decrease 
of the population in this group of settlements. The 
dominance of an aging population (o;rer 60 years) 
is characteristic of all the three subtypes of this 
main type  consistently exceeding county mean values. 
Table  I 
Major  characteristics  of  clusters 
11,  6,  and  12 
county 
c  lusters 
Variables 
mean 
11 

12 
values 
Number  of  settlements 
36 
48 
59 
Average population of 
settlements  in  1980 
1263 
389 
632 
697 
Number of  small  scale 
industrial workers 
in  1979 
11 



Value of consumer goods' 
turnover  in retail 
trade  in  1979  per 
capita  (Fts) 
3001 
1477 
2175 
1637 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies,  22 
1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
Scores of basic institution 
network 
12.1 
5.4 
7.9 
9.1 
Capacity of kindergartens for 
100 children of 3-6 years 
in 1979 
33.5 
19.3 
14.6 
3.7 
Proportion of those engaged 
in agriculture and fo-
restry in 1980 
41.8 
52.0 
57.0 
54.0 
Proportion of daily em-
ployment in 1980 
59.7 
63.0 
53.6 
61.8 
Proportion of flats built 
after 1945 to  all  flats 
in 1980 
52.5 
36.2 
47.4 
45.4 
Proportion of flats built 
between 1970 and 1979 
to all flats in 1980 
13.9 
40.4 
22.7. 
23.4 
Proportion of flats with 
water to all flats in 1980 
26.5 
8.5 
12.0 
13.2 
Proportion of flats with 
bathrooms or lavatories 
to  all flats in 1980 
21.7 
12.2 
17.5 
16.9 
Proportion of flats sup-

ied with electricity 
to all flats in 1980 
96.6 
91.5 
96.8 
97.8 
Proportion of flats sup-
plied with gas to all 
flats in 1980 
53.5 
32.6 
49.6 
59.0 
Accessibility (in minutes) 
to nearest town (district 
seat) in f980 
40.3 
57 
81 
33 
Frequency of means of trans-
port leaving for towns in 
1980 (departures/week) 
81.2 
39.7 
38.6 
66.7 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
23 
Change in population number 
between  1949 and  1980 
-9.0 
-36.3 
-26.6 
-24.0 
Differences  in migration 
between  1949  and  1980 
-13.2 
-21.1 
-19.1 
-17.7 
Proportion of 60 years old 
people or older  in  1980 
19.5 
25.8 
22.6 
21.3 
Social infrastructure in the initial stage 
of development consists of only the major elements 
of services, incl. services for housing, communality, 
trade, transport, public health, and elementary 
schooling. Many of these elements such as shops, 
consulting rooms, kindergartens, nurseries, elemen-
tary schools, are provided not by one settlement, 
but by adjacent groups of settlements. This type of 
infrastructure represents a low pace of housing, a 
high proportion of one-room flats, a low proportion 
of flats supplied with gas and water, a low value 
of consumer goods' turnover in retail trade, unfa-
vourable transport characteristics (long distances 
from transport network), poor communication, lack 
of nurseries, and insufficient capacity of kinder-
gartens. The devolution of social infrastructure 
has a great effect on the decrease of population, 
the distortion of demographic structure, exodus, 
and hence, on  the decreasing incomes from agri-
cultural production. 
Three subtypes (clusters 11, 6, 12) of social 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
24 
infrastructure in the initial stage of development 
can be distinguished which is based on the existing 
differences in the basic institutions. 
First subtype (cluster 11) involves hamlets situated 
in the hilly and mountainous regions of the county 
which are characteristic of the accumulation of back-
ward  conditions; underdevelopment of the basic insti-
tution network; low level of technical infrastructure; 
unfavourable transport facilities and a low level of 
amenities in the flats. 
Second 
 subtype 
 (cluster 6) consists mostly of hamlets 
and small villages of a definite agrarian nature lying 
in hilly and mountainous regions providing unfavour-
able living conditions, an insufficient and unbalanced 
network of institutions, underdeveloped technical 
infrastructure, negative transport characteristics, 
and long distances from  towns. These are the settle-
ments of the North Borsod Karst, Cserehat, Mts.  of 
Zemplen, Hegyktiz, Bodrogkoz, and  Taktakoz. 
Third subtype (cluster 12) is comprised of small vil-
lages and hamlets with insufficient basic institution 
network, underdeveloped technical infrastructure, but 
more favourable transport facilities than in the pre-
vious subtypes. These rural settlements are situated 
in every part of the county in smaller numbers; they 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
25 
constitute a contiguous ring only north of Encs in 
a region closed by Mts. of Cserehat and Zemplen, 
and in Bodrogkoz. 
II. Poorly developed social infrastructure with 
communication networks of medium-level 
This type of social infrastructure includes 
clusters 10, 13, and 7 which generate two subtypes. 
Almost 40 percent of rural settlements in Borsod 
County belong to this type; the majority of them can 
be found in the housing zones of large villages and 
more developed settlements. In general, the second 
main type is characterised by good transport facil-
ities and indices for public utilities and basic ser-
vices which are at least up to county mean values. 
Between these two subtypes there are significant 
differences in the development level of basic elements 
of services (as is illustrated by Table II). 
Table II 
Major characteristics  of  
clusters 10, 7, and 13  
cluster s 
Variables 
10 

13 
Number  of  settlements 
78 

58 
Average population number  of 
settlements  in  1980 
718 
1507 
1592 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
26 
Number  of  small  scale  industrial 
workers  in  1979 

15 
14 
Value of  consumer goods'  turnover 
in  retail  trade  in  1979  per 
capita  (Fts) 
1913 
3741 
4154 
Scores  of  basic  institution 
network 
7.9 
20.6 
18.3 
Capacity of  kindergartens  for 
100  children of  3-6  years 
in  1979 
6.7 
87.0 
71.0 
Capacity  of  nurseries  for  100 
children  of  0-3  years  in  1979 
0.2 
0.1 
38.9 
Proportion of  those  engaged  in 
industry  in  1980 
47.3 
29.4 
39.3 
Proportion  of  daily  employmeht 
in  1980 
72.5 
52.5 
47.5 
Proportion  of  flats  built  after 
1945  to  all  flats  in  1980 
55.2 
57.6 
51.7 
Proportion  of  flats  built  be- 
tween  1970  and  1979  to  all 
flats  in  1980 
27.0 
26.8 
29.0 
Proportion  of  flats  with water 
to  all  flats  in  1980 
20.5 
29.1 
24.1 
Proportion  of  flats  with  bath- 
rooms  or  lavatories  to  all 
flats  in  1980 
25.5 
31.0 
29.3 
Proportion  of  flats  supplied  with 
electricity  to  all  flats  VI  1980 
96.2 
96.9 
97.9 
Proportion  of  flats  supplied  with 
gas  to  all  flats  in  1980 
49.0 
62.2 
58.0 
Accessibility  (in minutes)  to 
nearest  town  (district  seat) 
in  1980 
22 
30 
26 
Frequency  of means  of  transport 
leaving  for  towns  in  1980 
(departures/week) 
82.2 
52.3 
77.4 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
27 
Change in population number be- 
tween  1949  and  1980 
-5.5 
-6.1 
-14.3 
Differences  in  migration  between 
1949  and  1980 
-11.5 
-8.7 
-12.3 
Proportion  of  60  years  old  people 
or  older  in  1980 
18.0 
18.2 
19.3 
The  value  of  index  3,  which  is - the  complex 
index of basic services, amounts to 10 scores in 
cluster 10 while these values in clusters 13 and  7 
amount to 18 and 20 scores accordingly exceeding 
considerably the county mean values. 
The  first subtype 
 (cluster 10) includes small hous-
ing settlements having a decreasing population, in-
sufficient institution network, poorer than average 
technical infrastructure, and an industrial-agrarian 
occupational structure. These settlements constitute 
contiguous, territorially homogeneous groups on 
• 
the southwestern hillside of the North Borsod Karst, 
at the southern fringe of the Cserehat, and in the 
valley of Hernad river, in the northern part of Bor-
sod Highplins in the environs of Leninvaros, in 
the Hegykoz, and in other, smaller, isolated parts 
of the county. 
The second 
 subtype 
 (clusters 13 and 7) is formed by 
small and medium-size settlements with a partly 
existing institution network, having housing and 
agrarian functions, and providing their inhabitants 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
28 
with facilities at an average level. They are 
situated in the Highlands of Ozd, Mts. of Buick, in 
the southern part of Borsod Highplains, in Hegyalja, 
in the southeastern periphery of Mts. of Zemplen, 
as well as in other smaller areas of the county. 
This subtype forms a homogeneous group regarding the 
development level of social infrastructure; however, 
these settlements showed disintegration in the 
course of investigations of types of rural settle-
ments of Hungary (BELUSZKY, P.-SIKOS, T.T. 1982, 
1984). 
III. Social infrastructure at an average development 
level 
This type of social infrastructure (clusters 
8 and 9) covers about 14 per cent of rural settle-
ments of Borsod County. They are dispersed settle-
ments situated in the hilly and mountainous regions 
as well as in the industrialised valley of Sajd river 
and in the Miskolc agglomeration. Majos character-
istics of the occupation structure of the 49 settle-
ments of this type are: high proportion (about 50 %) 
of workers engaged in industry; 30 per cent in agri-
culture; and 20 per cent in the tertiary sector. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
29 
In general, this type presented a rapid rate of 
house building between 1945 and 1980; it can be 
characterised by an average level of services of 
housing and public utilities (see  Table  III.). 
 
Table III
Major characteristics of clusters  

9 and 8 
Variab]es 
c lusters 


Number of settlements 
28 
21 
Average population number 
of settlements in 1980 
2675 
1041 
Number of small scale in- 
dustrial workers in 1979 
26 
12 
Value of consumer goods' turn- 
over in retail trade in 1979 
per capita (Fts) 
3031 
3102 
Scores of basic institution 
network 
18.6 
13.6 
Capacity of kindergartens per 
100 children of 3-6 years 
in 1979 
43.0 
67.8 
Capacity of nurseries per 100 
children of 0-3 years in 1979 
0.0 
0.0 
Proportion of those engaged in 
industry in 1980 
52.0 
49.7 
Proportion of those engaged in 
agriculture in 1980 
28.3 
31.6 
Proportion of daily employment 
in 1980 
65.5 
58.9 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
30 
Proportion of rooms for tourists 
to all flats in 1980 
2.2 
45.1 
Proportion of flats built after 
1945 to all flats in 1980 
69.6 
67.8 
Proportion of flats built be- 
tween 1970 and 1979 to all 
flats in 1980 
23.6 
21.7 
Proportion of one-room flats to 
all flats in 1980 
19.9 
21.7 
Proportion of flats with water 
to all flats in 1980 
40.7 
39.7 
Proportion of flats with bath-
rooms or lavatories to all 
flats in 1980 
43.3 
49.4 
Proportion of flats supplied 
with electricity to all flats 
in 1980 
98.6 
97.7 
Proportion of flats supplied 
with gas to all flats in 1980 
63.6 
57.0 
Accessibility (in minutes) to 
nearest town (or district 
seat) in 1980 
20.7 
60.0 
Frequency of means of transport 
leaving for towns in 1980 
(departuresiweek) 
235 
77.7 
Change in population number 
between 1945 and 1980 
39.1 
8.9 
Differences in migration be- 
tween 1970 and 1980 
-4.8 
-3.5 
Proportion of 60 years old• 
people or older in 1980 
13.4 
16.6 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
31 
The two subtypes of clusters 8 and 9 differ first 
of all in the development level of transport faci-
lities, tourist services and basic services. 
The first subtype (cluster 8) involves housing set-
tlements closely connected to the agglomeration of 
the Saja river valley. These settlements, situated 
in the hilly and mountainous regions of the county, 
have an averagely developed institution and trans-
port network, higher than average technical infra-
structure, and an industrial-agrarian occupation 
structure. They do not constitute a larger, conti-
guos group except for perhaps a few smaller groups 
in the northern part of Mts. Buick and Zemplen, and 
other regions of the county. 
In the second subtype (cluster 9) there are the set-
tlements of the agglomeration and housing zone in 
the Sajci river valley which have a dynamically `in-
creasing population, more favourable than average 
institution network and technical infrastructure, 
adequate transport facilities, and an industrial 
occupation structure. About 75 % of rural settle-
ments of the cluster_are situated along the indus-
trial axis of the Sajci river valley, and about half 
of them are the settlements of the Miskolc agglome-
ration. Industrial activity does not have a long 
history in these settlements, on the contrary, 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
32 
occupational restratification of settlements was 
initiated to meet labour force demands of the near-
by towns. Earlier, agricultural activity dominated 
in these rural settlements except for a few of them 
where extractive industry played an important role. 
IV. Social infrastructure at the advanced stage of 
development  
This type  (cluster 4) involves medium-size 
rural settlements that  have an agrarian-mixed  occu-
pation structure, a stagnating or  decreasing popu-
lation,  an adequate  supply of basic facilities and 
a more favourable than  average infrastructural net- 
work.  The il settlements of  this type do not consti-
tute  a contiguous group in the county;  they are 


situated in different localities. The value of the 
complex  index of basic services amounts to  25.5 
scores which are twofold higher than county mean 
values (Table IV.). 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
33 
Table IV 
Major characteristics of cluster 4  
Variables 
Cluster 4 
Number of settlements 
Average population number of 
settlements in 1980 
3059 
Number of small scale industrial 
workers in 1979 
32 
Value of consumer goods' turn-
over in retail trade in 1979 
per capita (Fts) 
7092 
Scores of basic institution 
network 
25.5 
Capacity of kindergartens per 
100 children of 3-6 years 
in 1979 
61.7 
Capacity of nurseries per 100 
children of 0-3 years in 1979 
18.5 
Proportion of those engaged in 
industry in 1980 
36.3 
Proportion of those engaged in 
agriculture in 1980 
_41.6 
Proportion of daily employment 
in 1980 
45.5 
Proportion of flats built after 
1945 to all flats in 1980 
52.5 
Proportion of flats built be- 
tween 1970 and 1979 to all 
flats in-1980 
18.5 
Proportion of one-room flats to 
all flats in 1980 
23.7 
Proportion of flats with water 
to all flats in 1980 
33.6 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
34 
Proportion of flats with bathrooms 
or lavatories to all flats in 1980 
38.0 
Proportion of flats supplied with 
electricity to all flats in 1980 
97.8 
Proportion of flats supplied with 
gas to all flats in 1980 
64.7 
Accessibility (in minutes) to nearest 
town or district seat in 1980 
20.0 
Frequency of means of transport 
leaving for towns in 1980 
(departures/week) 
68 
Change in population number between 
1945 and 1980 
—1.8 
Differences in migration between 
1970 and 1979 
—9.3 
Proportion of 60 years old people 
or older in 1980 
16.5 
Five out of the 11 settlements of this type 
possess the necessary basic institutions while in 
six of them the institutional network needs im-
proving. Both the size of retail trade shops and 
the value of consumer goods' turnover in retail 
trade shops in former small market towns (such as 
Abatijszanto, Gonc, Tarcal etc.) are above the 
average. There are nurseries, kindergartens, ele- 
mentary-schools (having at least 9 class—rooms), and, 
of course, libraries in each settlement of this type. 
An indicator of the development level of basic supply 
can be that in more than 50 % of these rural settle- 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
35 
meats there are consulting rooms. The accessibility 
(in minutes) to nearby towns and district seats is 
easy, however, the frequency of means of transport 
is lower than mean values of the county. In short, 
social infrastructure of this type provides favour-
able living conditions for the rural population. 
V. Social infrastructure characteristics of small 
towns 
Rural settlements of the two clusters (3 and 
2) have an institution network, occupational struc- 
ture, the level of industrialization, as well as long-
term demographic processes which can be found in 
small towns of Hungary (illustrated by Tablg V.) 
Table V 
Major characteristics of clusters 
3 and 2 
Clugters  
Variables 


Number of settlements 


Average population number of 
settlements in 1980 
3703 
8158 
Number of small scale in- 
dustrial workers in 1979 
45 
78 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
36 
Value of consumer goods' turn-
over in retail trade in 1979 
(Fts) 
17,572 
14,531 
Scores of basic institution 
network 
28.5 
31.2 
Capacity of kindergartens per 
100 children of 3-6 years 
in 1979 
54.9 
47.1 
Capacity of nurseries per 100 
children of 0-3 years in 
1979 
37.7 
6.4 
Proportion of those engaged 
in industry in 1980 
59.7 
44.8 
Proportion of those engaged in 
agriculture in 1980 
21.5 
27.6 
Proportion of daily employment 
in 1980 
18.9 
40.0 
Proportion of flats built after 
1945 to all flats in 1980 
84.0 
62.2 
Proportion of flats built be- 
tween 1970 and 1979 to all 
flats in 1980 
39.8 
23.2 
Proportion of one-room flats 
to all flats in 1980 
70.2 
26.2 
Proportion of flats with water 
to all flats in 1980 
70.2 
46.1 
Proportion of flats with bath-
rooms or lavatories to all 
flats in 1980 
69.0 
48.8 
Proportion of flats supplied with 
electricity to all flats in 1980 
98.5 
98.3 
Proportion of flats supplied with 
gas to all flats in 1980 
74.2 
59.3 
Proportion of flats connected to a 
sewage system to all flats in 
1980 
74.3 
49.3 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
37 
Accessibility  (in minutes)  to 
nearest  town or district  seat 
12.5 
6.7 
in  1980 
Frequency of means of  transport 
leaving for  towns  in  1980 
81.5 
128.8 
(departures/week) 
Change in population number be-
212.9 
46.8 
tween  1945  and  1980 
Differences  in migration between 
18.4 
-3.3 
1970  and  1979 
Proportion  of  60 years  old people 
8.5 
13.8 
or  older  in  1980 
Ten settlements of the county belong to this 
type, incl. 4 district seats (such as Edeleny, Sze-
rencs, MezOcsat and Encs), and 3 former district 
seats (as Szikszci, Putnok and Sajoszentpeter). In 
each of them there is a nursery, kindergarten, ele-
mentary school, library, and in 6 of them even a 
secondary school. 
The provision of housing differs from settle-
ment to settlement, which is partly explained by the 
significant state housing in addition to the private 
constructions in the 1960s and 1970s. State housing 
usually takes the form of flats built on estates, 
consequently the proportion of residential buildings 
having more than one storey has indreased (e.g. 
11.9 per cent in Sajobabony; 5.9 per cent in Sajo-
szentpeter; 4.1 per cent in Edelany). The amenities 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
38 
of flats are of high level, the proportion of flats 
supplied with water and connected to a sewage sys-
tem is well above the county average. 
Settlements of this type have good communica-
tion links with their environs; practically, all the 
settlements are situated along or next to main 
transport routes. All in all, the social infrastruc-
ture which characterises small towns provides favour-
able living conditions for the rural population. In-
deed, these settlements increased their population 
by 1.5 times between 1949 and 1980. 
It should be noted that two settlements were 
not ranged into clusters in the course of determining 
types of social infrastructure and they constituted 
independent clusters. One of them was Tokaj where 
the proportion of those engaged in the tertiary sec-
tor exceeds 40 per cent, and the other settlement 
was Ragaly with 27.3 7. of flats having more than one 
storey to all flats. 
Conclusion 
The following conclusion can be drawn as a 
result of investigations of social infrastructure 
in 352 rural settlements of Borsod-Abadj-Zemplen 
County. More than 40 per cent of the settlements 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
39 
have a social infrastructure which is in the initial 
stage of development; about 40 per cent of them have 
a poorly developed social infrastructure and a pub-
lic utility network which is only at a medium level 
of development; only 17 per cent of rural settlements 
have developed or averagely developed social infra-
structure; and there are only 10 dynamically devel-
oping rural settlements (less than 3 per cent) which 
can be characterized by social infrastructure of the 
small town type. 
Investigations underlined the significant  role 
of transport in the development of the social infra-
structure of rural settlements. The analysis contri-
buted to determining regions where rural settlements 
with poorly developed or underdeveloped social infra-
structure are found in greater numbers. These settle- 
, ments are situated first and foremost in the gserehat, 
North Borsod Karst, Mts. of Zemplen, Hegykoz, Bodrog-
koz, Mts. of Biikk and Borsod Highplains. 
The examination which was carried out in 
Borsod County as a mod6l region pointed out that 
factor and cluster analyses can be applied in pre-
paring the typology of social infrastructure of  
Hungary and other regions. 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional 
40 
Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 
ANDERBERG, M.R. 1973: Cluster Analysis for Applica-
tions. Academic Press, New York, San Fran-
cisco, London 
ANDORKA,R. 1979: A magyar kozsegek tArsadalmi Ata-
lakulAsa (Social transformation of rural 
settlements in Hungary), Magvet6, Budapest 
BARTA I Gy. 1972: Az infrastrukturalis ellatAs  terU- 
leti elteresei (Regional differences in 
infrastructural supply), Foldrajzi Ertesit6,  
21. pp. 4 59-470. 
.
BARTA,Gy. 1975: Mikrogeografiai vizsgAlat egy eszak-
borsodi faluban (Trizs) (Microregional inves-
tigation in a North Borsod rural settlement, 
Trizs. Foldrajzi Ertesit6, 24. pp. 391-416. 
BARTA,Gy. - BELUSZKY,P. - BERENYI,I. 1975: A hAtrA-
nyos helyzetE terUletek vizsgAlata Borsod-- 
Aballj-Zemplin megyeben (Investigation of 
backward regions in Borsod County), Foldrajzi 
lrtesitit  24. pp. 229-390. 
BARTA I Gy. - ENYEDI,Gy. 1981: IparosodAs es a falu  
Atalakulasa (Industrialization and rural 
transformation). KozgazdasAgi es Jogi, Buda-
pest 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
4 I 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
BELCSZKY I P. - SIKOS T. T. 1979: A faktor- is clus- 

teranalizis alkalmazisa a terUleti kutati-
sokban (Borsod-Abadj-Zemplen megye falusi 
telepUlesei tipizalasinak peldajan) (Appli-
cation of factor- and cluster analyses in 
regional studies (in case of Borsod County) 
.8z.112.1.1
12. pp. 191-210. 
BELUSZKY 1 P. - SIKOS T.T. 1982: Processus de trans-
formation l'habitat dans les regions rurales 
de la Hongrie. L'Espace Geographique. pp. 
124-133. 
BELUSZKY0'. - SIKOS T.,T. 1980: Application of Shift 
and Share Analysis in Regional Research (the 
method is illustrated by the demographic 
study of Encs district, in Borsod County). 
In: Development of Rural Areas  (Proceedings 
of the 4th Hungarian-Polish Seminar, pp. 
181-202, Goldap, Poland, 20-30 May, 1980. 
Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa 
BELUSZKY,P. - SIKOS T.T.

1982: Magyarorszig falu- 
tipusai 
 (Types of Rural Settlements of 
Hungary), MTA FKI, Budapest 
BELUSZKY l p. - SIKOS T.T.  1983: Typology of Rural  
Settlements in Hungary. H.A.S. Geographical 
Research Institute, Budapest 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
42 
BERtNYI,I. 1979: JOsvaf6 fbldrajzi adottsigainak 
ertekelese, kiilOnbs tekintettel az idegen-
forgalomra (Evaluation of Geographical En-
dowments of JOsvaf6 with special regards 
to tourism), FOldraizi Ertesit6. 27. pp. 
92-105. 
BERENYI,I. (ED) 1980: Tokaj telepillasfejlesztesenek 
fOldrajzi alapjai (Geographical basis for 
settlement development of Tokaj), Foldraizi  
Tanulmanyok, 17. Akademiai, Budapest 
BERENYI,I.- SIMO, T. 1979: Egy falu tarsadalmanak 
Atalakulasa /Tard/ (Social transformation 
of a village, Tard), Teruleti Kutatasok t 2. 
pp.  52-61. 
BELLEY,L. 1984: Gazdasagirinvitas es infrastruktti-
ra feilesztes (Economic management and de-
velopment of infrastructure), Kbzgazdasigi 
es Jogi, Budapest 
DEAK I J.ne - NADABAN I P.ne 1974: Az infrastrukturalis 
fejlettseg terilleti szint6 meresenek lehet6- 
segei (Possible evaluation of the development 
of infrastructure at a regional level), Terti-. 
leti Statisztika,24. pp. 481-502. 
ENYEDI,Gy. 1980: falvaink sorsa (Future of Rural 
Settlement of Hungary), Budapest: Magvet6 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
43 
ENYEDLI GY. 1983: FoldraiZ  4s  tarsadalos.,(Geography 
and Society), Budapest: MagvetO 
FRANCLA,L. 1975: A faktoranalizis alkalmazisa a la-
kossag eletkOrtilmenyei es az infrastrukturalis 
ellatottsag kozotti osszefUggesek terUleti 
elemzeseben, Baranya megye problematikus terU-
leteinek peldijan (Application of factor anal-
ysis in the regional investigation of linkages 
between the living conditions of population 
and infrastructural supply, in the case of 
problematic regions in Baranya County), TerU-
leti Statisztika, 25. pp. 245-253. 
HRUBI,L. 1983: TelepUldscsoportok Baranya megyeben 
az infrastrukturalis ellitottsigi szinvonal 
alapjan (Settlement Groups in Barauya County 
formed on the basis of the Level of Infrastruc-
tural Supply), .MTA Dunantuli Tudomanvos Inte-
zete 1Wzlemeavei,30. pp. 177-198. 
LACK6,L. 1974: Az orszag kedvezeitlen feltetelekkel 
rendelkezo terUleteinek helyzete (The posi-
tion of regions in Hungary with unfavourable 
terms), Tervgazdasagi Kozlemenyek, Budapest 
NIJKAMP, P. 1979: Multidimensional Spatial Data  and  
Decision Analysis. 
 John Wiley and Sons, 
Chichester, New  York, Brisbane, Toronto 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
44 
SIKOS T 1T. 1984: Matematikai es statisztikai modsze-
rek alkalmazisanak lehetosegei a terilleti ku-
tatasokban (Possible Applications of Mathema-
tical and Statistical Methods in Regional 
Studies), Akademiai Kiada, Budapest 
SIKOS T IT. (Ed) 1985: Possible Applications of  
Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Re-
gional Studies. H.A.S. Geographical Research 
Institute, Budapest 
SULI-ZAKAR,I. 1980:  A  Hegvkbz falufbldraizi vizsga-
lata. Kezirat. (Rural geographical research 
of Hegykoz (in Borsod County). Manuscript, 
Debrecen 
VAGVOLGYI, A. 1982: A falusi eletkbrUlmenyek fobb 
tipusai. (Major types of rural living con-
ditions), In: A falu a mai ma var tarsadalom-
ban (Village in the present Hungarian soci-
ety) Ed.: Vagviblgyi, A. pp. 91-178. Akade-
miai, Budapest 
VAN RYZIN, J. 1977: Classification and Clustering. 
Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, 
London 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
APPENDIX 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
Block Diagram of Investigations of Social Infrastructure 
of Rural Settlements  
Determination of tasks of research 
Establishment of data bank 
1. Selection of observation units 
2. Selection of indices 
Analysis of differences in 
Factor analysis 
Cluster analysis 
regional development levels 
1. Description of 
1. Description of 
of social infrastructure 
factors 
clusters 
1. Illustration of indices 
2. Characterization 
2. Illustration of 
on maps 
-->  of factors 
clusters on maps 
2. Analysis of maps 
3. Illustration of 
3. Determination of 
factors on maps 
types of social 
infrastructure 
Results 
Results 
Determination of 
Determination of 
elements having im-
types of social 
pact on the develop-
infrastructure 
ment and formation 
of social infrastruc- 
ture 
Fig.1  

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.
v. 3 
, — 7 • 

0 • •• 0 
-7 




. • 
• . 

t‘ 3 • G 
7' 
E • C. 
C
C'-E 
7 . c0 — 
110 



• 0 
0is 9 

0  In 
el 
M f13 

4, $.4 
s
)o 
•• 

C • .7 3. 
O
3 .7 
7. 
r• tat 
,..777•CIEC77•E 
• 

s• 

4+ 
V: 
.0 F. • 
17 FP 0 7 
•-s 
C • 
0.s 


E E 
E • 
• 
• 
 CE. 
0c


•• 
• • G. 0 7 

-• 

to, 
>.074.s
... 
•-,

7 .• 

ss• 
.-. 

•••• 

U0 ID 
cr, 
• Qeecoilli 

Sikos, T. Tamás: Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod Country. 
Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1987. 44 p. Discussion Papers, No. 4.





Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County
The Discussion Papers series of the Centre for Regional Studies 
of the -Hungarian Academy of Sciences was launched in 1986 to 
publish summaries of research findings on regional and urban de-
velopment. 
The series has 3 or 4 issues a year. It will be of interest to 
geographers, economists, sociologists, experts of law and 
political sciences, historians and everybody else who is, in one 
way or another, engaged in the research of spatial aspects of 
socio-economic development and planning. 
The series is published by the Centre for Regional Studies. 
Individual copies are available on request at the Centre. 
Postal address: 
nrA'Regionalis  Kutatisok 
Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian 
Kozpontja 
Academy of Sciences .  
H-7601 PECS 
P.O. Box 199 
Pf.199 
7601 PECS 
HUNGARY 
Phone: (72) 12 755 
Telex: 12 475 
Director general: Gyorgy ENYEDI 
Editor: Laszlo HRUBI 



Forthcoming in the Discussion  Papers series:  
Development of the Management of the Economy 
in East-Central 
Europe 
by 
Gyula Horvath 


Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County
Papers, published in the Discussion Papers series  
No. 1 OROSZ, Eva (1986): Critical Issues in the Development of 
Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard to Spatial 
Differences 
No. 2 ENYEDI, Gyargy - ZENTAI, Viola (1986): Environmental 
Policy in Hungary 
No.3 HAJDU, Zoltin (1987): Administrative Division and 
Administrative Geography in Hungary 


Discussion Papers 1987. No. 4. 
Investigations of Social Infrastructure in Rural Settlements of Borsod County
Kiadja a Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Regionalis Kutatesok Kbzpontja 
Felel6s  kiado:  Enyea,G9brgy akademikus, foigazgat6 
Sorozat szerkeszt6: Hrubi Laszld 
Keszult: TEMPORG Pecs 87-2125. 
4,9 A/5 iv terjedelemben, 250 peldanyban 
Felelos vezet6: Dr Kenai Sendor elndk