Discussion Papers 1986/1.
Centre for Regional Studies 
of Hungarian Academy of Sciences 
DISCUSSION PAPERS 
No. 1 
Critical Issues in the Deyelopment of Hungarisr 
Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences 
by 
OROSZ. Eva 
Series editor: HRUBI, Laszlo 
Pecs 
1986 




Discussion Papers 1986/1.
CONTENTS 
Page 
INTRODUCTION 

/a/ Universal Provision of Medical Care 

/b/ Some Characteristics of Financing 
Public Health 

/c/ Unified Oiganizational Structure 

PART ONE 
MAJOR TENSIONS IN EXTERNAL /SOCIO-ECONOMIC/ 
AND INTERNAL CONDITIONS OF HUNGARIAN PUBLIC 
HEALTH 
lo 
Unfavourable Trends in the Population's 
State of Health 
11 
Inadequacy of Developmental Resources; the 
Steadily Subordinated Role of Public Health 
in the Distribution of Resources 12 
Inner Disproportions in!the Development of 
Public Health 
11+ 
The Retardation of Hungarian Medical 
Technology 
16 
The Financing Mechanism for Public Health 
in the Framework of Budgetary Accounts 
17 

Discussion Papers 1986/1.
Page 
State Inclusion of "Bribes" /Gratitude-
Money/ in Doctor's Earnings 
18 
DifferencesBetween Public Health Neods 
and the Traditional System of Doctor's 
Values 
18 
The Low Level of the Social Integration 
of Public Health 
19 
PART TWO 
MAJOR PROCESSES OF REGIONAL INKUALITIES IN 
PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE. 
2o 
Uneven Moderation of Regional Differences 
in Practitioner and Hospital Provisions 
2o 
Adverse Development Paths in the Regions 
with Unfavourable Facilities 
24 
Effects of Regional Development Polir 
26 
Public Health PolioN and Regional 
Differvu-es 
29 
in s So i ri 
Re.I ;1,t i ohs  W i I h.i n I hr 
P cart i I i on, 1. 7  s wit  tlum 
SI'MMAPY 
REFERENCES 
17 
APPENDTX 
;:0 




Discussion Papers 1986. No. 1. 
Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian 
Public Health with Special Regard to Spatial Differences 3-47. p.
NTRODUCTION 
his study examines some important problems facing the 
ungarian health system, particularly with regard to 
dentifying spatial differences in the provision of health 
are. The study consists of two parts: the first presents 
summary of the relevant literature;while the second dis- 
c sses the research findings. The remainder of the intro- 
uction provides an overview of the post-WWII Hungarian 
iealth system to help better acquaint readers who may not 
e familiar with the situation here. 
t the close of World War II,  Hunga•y inherited  a dispropor-
ioned health care facility network  resulting both from 
ormer development patterns and  from cosidevable war damage. 
arge  areas and wide social strata had  to do without medical 
care. 
n the course of the  post-war decades. however ouistanding 
results have been reached: mass diseases have been liqui-
dated;  and  objective, subjective and organizational precon-
ditions  for public health care covering the whole area of 
the country, along will (he expansion of social insurance 
have been established. /14/ 
A major achievement of socialist public health has been ra-
pid suceesS in the prevention and cure of "morons hungaricus", 
i.e. tuberculosis. For example, our of lo thousand inhabi- 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 4- 
tants, there were 9.61 deaths due to tubercolosis in 1949, 
but only 2.51 in 1965. 
Infant mortality has also decreased remarkably. Out of one 
thousand new-born children /under the age of one year/ 156. 
died in 1930-31. However, this rate averaged 98.3 between 
1945 and 195o, while data for 1961-65, 1969-7o and 1983 wer 
respectively  42.7;  35.8; and 19. This latest figure though 
is admittedly  rather unfavourable by  international comparis 
In 1938,  10,590 - or 11.7 per lo,000 - practicing doctors 
were in Hungary,  whereas today 2o,358 - or 26.6  per  lo,000 
provide medical  care, a rise of 2.3 times. 
This increas 
in the doctor-population ratio is outstanding even with 
respect to international standards; with Hungary holding 
fourth or 
fifth place in Europe during the late seventies. 
Furthermore the number of hospital beds amounted to only 
48,898 in 1938 /a rate of 54.0 per ton thousanu inhabitants, 
while in 1983 96,398 beds wore serving the recovery of the 
sick population, y3ilding a bed-population rate of 9o.3. 
Three features of the Hungarian public health system are 
notable: 
/a/ medical care /treatment/ is offered to every Hungarian 
citizen free of charge /as a social right/; 
/b/ financing this system relies both on State budget and 
the budgets of councils; 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 5 
/c/ the system has a  unified organizational structure 
operated by  the state. 
/a/ Universal  Provision of Medical Care  
Health insurance covered hardly more than one third of the 
Hungarian population before 1945. Peasant and agricultural 
workers, who represented the majority of the population al-
most stood completely outside the social insurance system. 
The organizational system of health insurance was extraor-
dinarily scattered, with more than 3o health insurance insti-
tutions operating in the country. 
Unification of the organizational system was carried out 
at the end of the forties. Nevertheless, a decisive turn in 
the expansion of health insurance took place in the early 
sixties. It was motivated by the socialist reorganization 
of agriculture; that is, the free medical care /treatment/ 
wasnlso extended to the co-operative peasantry. While so-
cial insurance covered only 62 per cent of the Hungarian 
population in 19'17, this figure rose to  97  per cent by 
1965. 
The Public Health Act passed in 1972 is regarded as a new 
stage of development, inasmuch as it was declared that 
every citizen has the right to free medical treatment. 
However, each person must pay a modest fee for medicines. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 6- 
/b/  Some Characteristics of Financing Public Health 
On the one hand the system of financing public health inst: 
tutions is separate from the institutional system of socia: 
insurance. However, on the other hand,both systems of final 
cing  are closely connected with the State budget. Einployeel 
pay old-age pension-contribution on the basis of their wage 
and salaries, while employers pay social insurance contribi 
tion on  the basin of  wage costs. These sums represent a pax 
of the  State budget incomes. Social  insurance expenditures 
-/for pensions, sickness benefit, etc./, in turn, represent 
an element of the State budget expenditures. Nevertheless, 
there is not a direct relation between the two money funds 
/i.e. between the incomes and expenditures of the social 
insurance/.  An overwhelminfT majority of public health insti 
tutions is under  the management of local /city  or village/ 
or county councils. Accordingly, those institutions are 
financed from the budget of the councils. /A considorible 
part of  the budgetary funds of councils derives from State 
subsidies./ 
The management and financing of medical universities and 
other national medical institutions are performed directly 
by the Ministry of Health. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 7- 
/c/ Unified Organizational Structure 
The public health system, established in the last third of 
the past century, represented historical precedents of the 
present public health organizational system. Act 1876/XIV 
concerning the organization of public health in Hungary was 
a remarkable composition even on the international scene. 
In addition to hygienic and epidemic directions, this law also 
provided for a comprehensive regulation of the institutional 
system of public health. For example, the law stipulated that 
every town as well as every village with a population over 
six thousand people, hid to have a public practitioner. Mi-
nor settlements jointly employed a rural district doctor. 
The law also declared that the management of public health 
was the task of the State, and that the management system 
of public health was formed on the basis of public administ-
ration. However, due to the social-economic backwardness of 
the country, only a fraction of the progressive spirit and 
aims of the law on public health were realized by 1945. 
Before 1945, in addition to public health services opera-
ted by local authorities, medical care /treatment/ was also 
provided by different social insurance institutions, as 
well as charitable and private institutes. This scattered 
organizational system of public health was unified in the 
early fifties. At the same time, the system was put under 
the twofold management and control of the Ministry of Health 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 8 - 
and the councils. The operation of the unified public heal 
organization became based on the principle of regional res 
ponsibility. The essence of this principle manifests itsel 
in the fact, that every public health service unit /distri 
doctor, welfare centre, hospital etc./ looks after the po-
pulation of a pre-determined /prescribed/ area /district/. 
As in other countries, public health is an extraordinarly 
complex system also in Hungary. Within the framework of th 
study only the major branches can be outlined. 
Today, primary health care is performed by district gene-
ral practitioner's service, plant /factory/ practitioners, 
district pediatricians, dental surgeons, as well as the ch 
mist network. In 1983, one district general practitioner t 
care of 2526 inhabitants. Out of the 3121 settlements of t 
country 1589 /50.9  per cent/, were served loyalTy by a d 
* riot general practitioner. 
Out-patient care  is performed by  ambulatory clinics and 
chronic care facilities. In-patient care is offered - on 
thd basis of the progressive care /regionalized health sys 
tem/ principle - by city and county hospitals, four univer 
sity clinics, and national special institutions. Universit 
clinics and three county hospitals also perform regional 
level  tasks. /In cities with hospitals the ambulatory elin 
and the hospital constitute one organizational 
unit./ In 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.

198o there were 196 hospitalizations per one lhonsand inha- 
bitants. One of the main tasks of preventive-therapeolie (-ace 
is the protection of women, children, family and youth. 
The main forms of social care  are: social normin homes /for 
the  aged, as well as physienify and  mentally handicappee 
p  ople/ day-home for the elderly.  visiiinp; sociol 
allowances. 
Sanitation  and - epidemic sel-cieos  ;WC  svp:Ir;liod rvom  proven-
tive-therapeotic ones in loth or:7oniz3):lo31 and implementation. 
The tasks of the rormor se•vircs cover amon others: modera-

Iion or drI•imcnial envirmum , inal condil ions. occupational 
ond oolritional  ho;111h inquiries.  nrrycniion and overcomin 
ir r c I i 

cic. Their orani/alionoi mulls are 
Mc so c:111cd 
-s 
epidemic  slalions/  on 
the coonl\-lovel. as 
scr‘i , cs  0 Pelniin in 
and the disfricis  ur  111;-• 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
lo - 
PART OYE 
MAJOR TENSIONS IN EXTERNAL /SOCIO-ECONOMIC/ AND INTERNAL 
CONDITIONS OF HUNGARIAN PUBLIC HEALTH 
Disadvantageous processes have emerged in the population's 
health conditions during the past lo-15 years. Accordingly, 
the role played by the population's demographic state and 
level of health in Hungarian socio-economic development has 
changed dramatically. This limiting impact on economic deve-
lopment will increase in future decades. 
Public health infrastructure today represents one of the 
critical issues ooneerning Living condi tions. Its develop-
meat  lagged  behind both the lovilL  of economic progress and 
the  r0 0 0loomonis or sooioiv.  This backwardness ran he attri-
buted  1p 
the  [imited resort ryes  available for development.  flu 
inner  di  sp rope c l ions iu  1,11 ,,  dove 1 oilmen 
or pub 
heal Lb. 
and the incompletely built-up institutional  systcm  or  sookil 
At 
this developmental 
sl - ac.  ”r  public health, the problems 
ialed tc i l It re How,  1 differenees become manif , - I 
in 
waNs di•re•ent from those or more dynamicatlx develo1,in7 
Iligh  level  public  health infrastructures. 
The position of 
more haelosard arras is noncrallv  more or;tival, the diffe-
relives uere estabtishcd  long  ago. Iho material conditions 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 11 - 
for their moderation are more limited, etc./ 
Unfavourable Trends in the Population's State of Health 
Hungary is among the worst European countries in terms of 
its  general health and mortality characteristics. The extent 
and the  steadiness of deterioration of the mortality rate 
differ from the trends in countries with a similar level of 
development, as well as in  the more advanced ones. /15/ 
Mortality trends are fundamentally influenced by cardio-
vascular and tumourous diseases. If]. Hungary, these two groups 
of illnesses caused 72.7 per cent of total mortality in 1983 
/or, to put it more precisely,  53.3  percent vas represented 
by cardiovascular diseases, while 19.4 per cent by tumours/. x/ 
 
Mortality per ten thousand Hungarian male population due to 
cardiovaseular diseases is the highest among the countries 
of Europe. In 1982, out of ten thousand Hungarian men twiee 
as many /72.1/ died of cardiovascular diseases  RN  in France. 
x/ 
Mortality investigatio:0 indicate, thatc Ihe aging of the 
population has been only one factor in the deteriorating 
mortality rate. Since 19Wi. the mortality indices-by age 
and sex-of age groups over 3o years have been increasing 
steadily. /3/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 12 - 
Greece, Spain or Japan. Our position is even worse in compa-
rison with other countries, if we regard only mortality data 
of age groups between 45 and 65 years. x/ 
 
Life expectancy at birth has increased or at least stagna-
ted in most European countries in the seventies. Hungary, 
however, belongs to those  few countries where life expec-
tancy  has decreased. Life expectancy  of the male population 
is lower today than in 196o. The improvement of life expec-
tancy at birth of the male population stopped in the mid-
sixties. Since then it has stagnated or declined. Life 
expectancy at birth of our male population is one of the 
lowest in Europe. 
Inadequacy of Developmental Resources; the Steadily 
Subordinated Role of Public Realth'in the Distribution 
of Resources 
The functioning of the public health  sphere is characte-
rized by  shortages. 
x/ Investigations  of causes of death suggest that "Higher 
domestic mortality is not a consequence of  the larger weight 
of  a particular cause, but there is a  proportionally higher 
mortality in every group of diseases in our country, than in 
the majority of 4he European countries /only the share of 
suicides differs remarkably from that in the countries in 
Europe/." /2/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 1 3 - 
e  basic cause of this shortage is that the extention 
f social insurance rights to the whole population during 
he sixties was not followed by the creation of the materi-
1 /financial/ conditions necessary for the realization of 
hese rights. /17/ 
e trend in development resources of Hungarian public health 
iffers remarkably from those in the western European states. 
ublic health expenditures in these countries expanded con-
iderably between 196o and 1975, gaining increased shares 
in their gross domestic prodUct as well. However, an abrupt 
alt to these increased expenditures has occurcd seince the 
id-seventies. /19/ The share of expenditures :' , or Hungarian 
ublic health as a percentage of the national income did 
of change remarkably between 196o and  1980. /Expenditures 
On maintainance and operation of public health and social 
institutions represented 3.52 per cent of the national 
income in 1965. This figure was 3.2 per cent in 197o, thon 
p.52  per cent in 1975 and finally 3.87 per cent in 1980./ 
his means that the development of public health had been 
Overshadowed in the sixties and the seventies, lagging 
behind both the economic development of the country and the 
requirements of public health. 
Development of public health has priority among the infra-
structural goals of national economic plans in the first 
half of the eighties. Nevertheless, economic difficulties 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 1 4- 
in Hungary led to the narrowing of the developmental sources 
for the national economy as a whole. The restriction 
in domestic consumption also affects the development of 
the so-called public services. However, limitations influ- 
enced public health to a lesser extent than for other fields. 
This is shown by the fact that the share of public health 
from the national income has slightly increased after 1980. 
Despite this, developmental resources are hardly sufficient 
even to maintain the present level of public health care. 
Inner Disproportions in the Development of Public Health 
The developmental path of Hungarian public health in the 
post 1945 period can be described  by successive dispropor-
tions. An initial stage which accentuated manpower and neg-
lected tho development of hospitals, was followed by a 
trend of "concentrdting" on hospitals in the seventies. 
The former developmental direction, "concentrating" on 
manpower between 1945 and 197o, means - to  put it simply  
that the public health government tried to satisfy the in - 
creasing needs of the population first of alL through in - 
crease in the number of physicians and the development of 
out-patient care. This was a less capital intensive way 
of public health development than a policy, aimed at 
proportional development of care offered by hospitals and 
physicians. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
15 


velopmental goals in the seventies meant not only that 
U e development of hospital care - overshadowed for de-
des - obtained an proper position in the organization 
public health, but in a certain interpretation it al-
meant the replacement of the "manpower-centered" deve- 
lc pmental direction by a new disproportion of development, 
melt' a "hospital-centered" trend. However, this latter 
e ent did not entail that sufficient resources for hospi-
t 1 development were at disposal. In essence, du•inr: the 
d stribution of insufficient overall resources, the dc- 
velopmental needs of primary and social care were oversha-
dewed. 
1M faot, primary health care  does liol manirest iiselV a. 
a  "basis" of  Cho orr;anizalion  or  public health. Prevention. 
i  1:t 1  j 
and "heal tIt ethical I , ./1" 
onI i nt,,. 
PLI\ 
tiII hordinuled vole to therapeutic activit\. 
I. 
lily dc\e- 
r. 
lopmont  or  an institotional noluork and ncl i i oc. ,r 
cial care /Fo• handicapped and ited people: also lacd 
I  tiernal disproportions in dovelopment:dse appear in the 
fart that the transfOrmi.cn and 
 or  lho  a y. 
tixttls 
steueture  of public health are rather  slow as corn= 
p4red with eltanes in the  structure of needs. New avtivi-
Oes and organizational elements emerge with a delay and . 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 16 - 
are spred slowly.  This is especially the case in the field 
of mental health care. 
Disproportions  in the development of public health can be 
attributed first of  all to the insufficiency of resources, 
the inadequate distribution mechanisms of resources, prob-
lems  in the management  of public health and the problems 
concerning the inner hierarchy  and traditional value syster, 
of doctors. 
The Retardation of Hungarian Medical Technology• 
Diagnose, prevention, and treatment of different diseases 
lag remarkably behind the world-wide possibilities offered 
by the general level or technology. The  scarcit7 of  resour/ 
has been ()Lily a partial reason for this. An exaggerate( 
quantitative view and methodelegicat deficiencies of public 
health planning also. contributed to the backwardness. 
"Oct hospit:,1-huilding normatives are eatastrophical from 
the peil.  .r view of  instrument-requirements  .r  the upto-
date public hoaith  and  admissien rapacities. until reeentl) 
the hospital-building policy  was  characterized by one-sidec 
rush to increase the number  0P  beds on  every level." 
/5;  p.49/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
17 

 - 
T  e Financing Mechanism for  Public Health in the Framework 

Budgetary Accounts  
In fie present system of State budget and the financing ac-
: 4vities of councils public health may constantly be over-
' shadowed against the other sectors in the council budget. 14( 
reol.rer, some subsectors may lastingly be in'h dispreferred 
pas:Alen within public health as a whole. The p2esent mecha, 
n'sm has greatly influenced the conservation of the regiona! 
differences. 
'There is no adequate relation either between the doctors' 
' aCtivities and their earnings, or between the hospitals' 
ativitics and their receipts. 
"lin Hungary there is practically no relation between the 
plerformance and the receipt:; of the hospital at all. Coun-
( ,i1 /or Ministry/ financing the hospitals allots for the 
hospital considerable sums even if the hospital's perfor-
Mance is not adequate.  /To  put it more precisely, as there 
is no measure to qualify, which institution has a better /or 
lorso/ performance, hence thO inter-personal ties come ne-
Ocssarily to the fore."  /8;  p. 43/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
-  1 8 - 
State Inclusion of "Bribes" /Gratitude-Money/  in Doctor's 
Earnings  
"Official" earnings of doctors are extraordinarily low, 
if we regard the social utility of their work and the "ca-
pital" spent on their training, etc. In the course of the 
past decades, the so-called "gratitude-money" given by pa-
tients-tacitly tolerated by the  State and  regulated only 
by the "actual habits%-has become a main element  in the 
income /earnings/ of a considerable strata of doctors. This 
condition provided to the State an opportunity to postpone 
doctor's salary-increases. However, "corrigation" of doc-
tor's earnings by gratitude-money represents  waste  both 
on the part of the State and on the part of the patients-
This situation also leads to tensions within the doctors' 
society. /1/ In addition, gratitude-money-through the In-
terests of the doctors-hinders the transformation of the 
activity-structure of public health. 
Differences Between Public Health Needs and the Traditional 
System of Doctor's Values 
The prestige of district or workshop practitioners' acti-
vities and that of prevention and chronic care is low within 
the doctor's society. The present "popular diseases" would 
require psychosomalical or social therapeutic care. Never - 
theless, the prevailing view and education both prefer the 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 1 9 - 
ideal of medical science and the natural scientific cha-
racter of medical activities.  /6, 11/ 
,  The Low Level of Social Integration of Public Health 
The Hungarian government liquidated the Social Welfare 
Ministry /responsible both for social policy and public 
health care/ at the end of the forties. At the same time 
the Ministry of Health /with decreased authority/ was set 
up. The political ideas of the period in uuestion stood in 
the background of the transformation. It was thought that 
the social political problems would be solved parallel 
to economic development under socialism. 
Accordingly,  the  solution of numerous social problems 
/e.g. alcoholism, suicide etc./ has remained without an 
adequate system of institutions in the  last decades, Ell-
though  ihey have their own publie health  aspects.  Finally, 
the solution was left to public health; tliat is, the unsol-
ved problems were fed back to public health in a nmedicini-
zed',  form inereasing the tensions in this sphere. In the 
lack of financial resources, public ,  health was stimulated 
to decline /set aside/ the social political problems. /13/ 
The political view of social and social political prob-
lems were radically transformed in the seventies. However, 
the effect of this turn on actual social processes still 
manifests itself only in a rather  limited manner. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 2o - 
PART TWO 
MAJOR PROCESSES OF REGIONAL INEQUALITIES IN PUBLIC HEALTH 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
So far we have reviewed - in outlines - the main problems 
characterizing the development of Hungarian public health. 
The problems treated on the one hand, reflect considerable 
regional differences /e.g. remarkable regional differences 
in the health of the population, the technical state and 
equipment of hospitals, etc./ and, on the other, they pro-
vide wider frames -  in part - for  the trend of regional 
differences in public health intrastructuro. The major 
issues  concerning these  regional differences are discussed 
below. 
Uneven Moderation of 11.040.onal Differences in Practitioner 
and Hospital Provisions  
In the past few decades the number of practitioners has 
increased at a faster rate, than that of hospital beds. 
Between 196o and 1982 the number of doctors per ten thousand 
inhabitants increased by 72 per cent, while the number of 
hospital beds per ten thousand inhabitants grew by 28 per 
cent. 
This trend, however, did not result in the best possible, 
or even necessary, moderation of the legional differences 
in the supply of physicians. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Moreover,  the trend of regional differentiation, as op_ 
posed to  simple growth, has been in an adverse direction. 
Regional differences in the supply of physicians decrease 
to a lesser  extent than the  supply of hospital beds. 
The  relative position of most counties changed only to a 
small  extent. The moderation of the immense inequalities 
the provision of physicians between Budapest and the count 
side slowed down after 197o, and regional differences in 1 
supply of physicians in villages increased during the same 
period. Regional differences in the supply of physicians t 
between Budapest and the countryside and among the individ 
al counties - first of all in the fields of special care - 
were remarkable in the early eighties. Differences within 
individual public health branches were even more critical 
and  pronounced. The above characterized processes are iliu 
rated by Tables 1 and 2. /The  former illustrates the trend 
in differences among the counties, while the latter shows 
the differences between Budapest and the countryside./ 
While investigating the differences in the supply of hospi-
tal bed, we notice a considerably greater moderation than 
in the supply of physicians. Out of the lowland counties, x/ 
 
x/ Their number amounts to  7,  including the largest county 
/Pest/. The counties in  question are located /from the Danul 
in the eastern part of Hungary,  while the western part is 
called Transdanubia.; 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table  
Relative Values of Major  Indicators of Regional Differences 
in Public Health  Infrastructure 
/the value for  the county with the best position  equals loo/ 
Number of Physicians 
Numher of  Specialist 
.
Counties 
per lo,000 Inhabitants  per lo,000 Inhabitar 
196 o 
197o 
1982 
196o 
197o 
1982 
County in the  best 
position 
loo 
loo 
loo 
luo 
Lou 
loo 
Average of the 
counties 
56. 
5 8 
 
61 
!I() 
52 
'it) 
Count;  in the 
worst position 

35 
37 
43 
22 
26 
Standard deviation 
/per cent/ 
24.8 
22.5 
2o.8 
37.9 
34.o 
3o.5 
Number  or rospiLai  Hod per loom° 
tani:s \/ 
I 97 I 
I 9 S 2 
County in the hesi 
position 
T , )o 
Average of the 
counties 
Count -s in the worst 
position 
Standard deytation 
/pe• cent/ 
3 -).1 
L 7. I 
x/ without hods in central sanatflria 
Source: 
the author's own oom1,uiati0 - on  the  basis  of  data 
issued by the Ministr\ 0 , 
,1111 and the Central 
Statistical O1'1' is 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.

2 3 -' 
"ruble 2 
Trend in Inequality of Public Health Provision Between 
Budapest and the Country side  
/Budapest = loo/ 
196o 
197o 
1982 
(County average number of 
physicians per 10,00o 
inhabitants 
30.0 
39.9 
45.4 
!County average number of 
(specialists per lo,000 
inhabitants 
2o.7 
lo.3 
34.9 
'County average number of 
hospital beds per lo,000 

!inhabitants 
55.3
49.) 
54.8 
x/ Data of 1961 and 1971 
Source: see Table 1 
those not possessing it flied -lent nniversity are si i I I 
it 
disadvantageous position, so we cannot speak of a complete 
equalization of regional differences. 
Nevertheless, n eritical  point or  hospital incrastrneture is 
,represented first of all not by the differences in numbers 
!of beds, but by the regional differences in the professional 
/public health branch/ distribution of beds, as well as in 
technical conditions and equipment of the hospitals. The latter 
differences, for instance, became wider between 1965 and 
1980. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 24- 
Furthermore, considerable differences can be found  in 
the spatial structure of hospital provision, i.e. the re-
gional location of hospitals. 
The regional location of hospitals - considering  the  main 
regions of the country - shows remarkable  differences. Thy 
differences - deriving mostly from  inadequate transpor 
and communication facilities - greatly affect  access to 
hospitals. A  dense network of medium and small  hospitals - 
. besides the large ones -  was established in Transdanubia, 
especially in its  nothern part. For instance, there  are 1 1 
 settlements with hospitals 
in three Transdanubian counties 
/of 9600  square kilometres/. 
Quite another hospital  structure can be found on the low-
land areas  of Hungary.  Here, small hospitals are rarely 
found. Moreover, there are only five settlements that poss 
a hospital in two lowland counties /of 11,844 square kilo- 
metres/. In the lowland region the average area per one hospi 
is  8o  per cent  larger, than in Transdanubia, while the ave 
population per hospital is 6o per cent greater than in Tra 
danubia. 
Adverse Development Paths in Pe rTi 
with rnfavourable 
Facilities 
In 196o, there were two regions in unfavourable position cl 
sidering supply of physicians, hospital beds and per capiti 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 25 - 
public health expenditures of the individual counties. 
They were: /a/ three south-western counties /Zala, Somogy 
and Tolna/; /b/ five counties in the middle and eastern 
region of the country /Bics-Kiskun, B4k4s, Pest, Szabolca-
Szatmar and Szolnok/. 
The counties of the former region 
closed the gap by 
198o, thereby ameliorating their unfavourable position. 
Nevertheless, the relative position of counties in unfa-
vourable conditions in the eastern region improved only 
to a smaller extent. This has remained the region with 
the worst provision of the country. Stabilization of the 
detrimental position can be observed here. We have to  empha-
size,  however, that the extent of lagging behind both the 
country average and the counties in the best position de 
creased between 196o and 198o /especially as to the number 
of hospital beds per ten thousand inhabitants/. 
The "leveling" in question, however, is largely of a  guano-
titative character. Namely, the structure of social needs 
for public health care has considerably altered in  the past 
decades. The counties with lower provision were in  a worse 
position to adjust the structure of their public  health 
infrastructure•to changing, needs than counties with above 
average provision. Or put another way: "close-up-processes" 
of the past decades moderating the backwardness of the pre-
ceding period have not promoted - to a sufficient extent - 
a parallel "adjustment" to the newly emerging needs. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 26 - 
In three of the counties with most unfavourable public 
health care /BAcs-Kiskun, Pest and Szabolcs-Szatmar/ life 
expectancy was lower than the country's average in the 
early eighties. Male life expectancy at birth was the lowest 
here in Hungary in 1981. As far as female life expectancy 
is concerned the values for counties Szabolcs-Szatmar and 
Pest were the lowest. 
Mortality is also affected by numerous /non public health/ 
socio-economic factors. Hence, we do not presuppose a direct 
cause-effect relations between the provision of public health 
institutions and mortality. However, we have to mention as 
a "neuralgic point" of public health care that in counties 
with the worst mortality and life expectancy the conditions 
for health care are also the most unfavourable. 
Effects of Regional Development Policy 
Regional inequalities in publiC health infrastructure  have 
also been influenced by numerous processes outside  or  publie 
health, among others by regional development,policy and  Hie 
distribution mechanisms of council's financing  activities. 
The past decade, i.e. the seventies brought n , •w de\eIopments 
both in regional policy and public health.  The c.Atecaled 
attention paid to hospitals in public health  development 
has already been discussed. Settlement development in It 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
seventies was characterized by strong concentration of 
both population and development capital in towns. "One 
of the causes of the intensifying population concentra-
tion has been the increasing concentration in towns of 
the so-called communal developments meant to improve the 
settlement environment and the living conditions. Towns 
utilized  88  per cent of the total communal developmental 
fund of the country in 1979,  while this figure was only 
78  per cent in 197o. /In 1979 the capital s share alone 
was 42 per cent./" /7; p•729/ 
The effects of these processes — i.e. emphasis on towns 
in settlement development and on hospitals in public 
health policy - were mutually reinforcing. Developmental 
resources of public health were concentrated in towns 
to a greater extent than those for the development of 
infrastructure as a whole. The other side of the process 
is that regional differences became even larger in nume-
rous components of health care in villages. 
Along with the "synchronic trends" of on the town-centero 
regional development and hospital-centered public health 
development was an "asynch .ronic" relation of regional 
processes concerning primary health care. Rapid population 
growth - mainly in the Transdanubian and northern towns - 
was not followed by the development of primary health car( 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
For instance, population growth rate of over lo per cent 
was accompanied by the deterioration in the district prac-
titioner's care in 54 per cent of towns of Transdanubian 
and northern counties, as well as in the agglomeration 
around Budapest between 197o and 1980. 
further essential feature of regional development is the 
steadily worsening position of public health in the finan-
cing activities of councils. 
minor part of the developmental funds for public health 
is controlled by the Ministry of Health. These resources 
are distributed among the institutions /universities of 
medicine, national institutes, etc./ under the supervision 
of this ministry. During the Fifth Fivo-Year Plan period 
/1976-8o/, centralized public health investments had a 
share of 25.2 per cent of total public health investments, 
or, in another words, the central budgetary expenditures 
on public health represented 23.6 per cent of total public 
health and social expenditures in 1980. /The former figure 
was 2o.5 per cent for the period 1981-83 and the latter 
one was 23.6 per cent in 1983./ 
The larger proportion of funds for public health comes 
from the resources available for the financing activities 
of councils. In the past decades, one of the main features 
of the distribution mechanism of councils was the fact that 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
29 


some activities or some regions of the country were cons-
tantly overshadowed.  /2o/ 
The continued low position of public health in the dis-
tribution is also illustrated - among others - by the fact 
that - according to our own calculations - its share of 
budgetary expenditures in every county council has decreased. 
Public Health Policy  and Regional Differences 
Here we emphasize the most important and general features 
of public health policy in the past decades, i.e. those 
ones that we regard as being of basic importance from the 
point of 'view of regional differences. 
Adjustment of public health policy to changes in social 
needs was characterized not by continuous, organic altera-
tion /in planning, management, financial regulation, opera- 
tion of institutions, etc./, but rather by lags,  considerable 
delays, i.e. lone years between "recognition" and "decision". 
Ultimately, decisions aiming at the acceleration of adjustment 
were "coaxed out" mainly by the speedy increase in the 
number of heart diseases and the alarming deterioration of 
the mortality rate. 
One of the essential issues of this investigation has been 
the relation between adjustment to social needs and regio- 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.

3 o  - 
nal differences. According to the analyses a hypothesis on 
the relation of "adjustment" and regional differences can 
be formulated in the following way: in the case of several 
components - which are of great importance from the point 
of view of adjustment - the process of adjustment is accom-
panied by stabilizing and deepening regional differences 
not only among the counties and between the towns and the 
villages, but also within the group of villages. 
In the field of hospital care, certain treatments, for ins-
tance casualty surgery and intensive therapeutic care were 
established with great regional discrepancies. /9,18/ Simi-
larly, manifold differences can be observed in psychiatric 
care, too. 
Villages were not only "avoided" by the aspirations aiming 
at the modernization of the organization and functioning 
of public health care, but they had a smaller share in 
opportunities offered by the rapid development of medical 
technology. One case study reveals the extreme differences 
in the equipment of village consultation-rooms.  A  conside-
rable part of districts lacks material conditions for mee- 
ting increased primary care need. /16/ Nevertheless, public 
health management tries to solve this problem first of all 
by organizational means, rather than through stronger in-
crease of the resources for primary care. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 31- 
Components of public health policy are primarily represen-
ted by professional targets, such as development of preven-
tion and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, as well as 
strengthening the role of chronic care, etc. Targets concer-
ning the development of some elements of the institutional 
network /medical districts, hospital beds, places in homes 
for the aged, etc./ represent a similarly important public 
health policy conception. These latter targets serve as a 
basis for the distribution of resources within the indi-
vidual five-year, 
 plan periods. There is no synchronism bet-
ween these two spheres of public health policy. The 
established methods and mechanisms of planning are not able 
to serve efficiently enough the targets promoting the ad-
justment of public health policy to needs. 
Or, to put it 
in another way: at present  adequate means for adjustment 
do not exist in planning, the operation of institutions 
/financial  regulation/, the information system of public 
health, etc. 
"Plans for the development of public health were restric-
tedonly to the money outlays of the development and the 
maintainance of public health institutions and equipment 
almost until now. Accordingly, ideas of planners began and 
ended in terms of means, establishments, money ... Methodo-
logical ordering principles to measure the needs for care 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 32 - 
on the basis of the state of health of the population were 
almost completely absent from the practice of planning..." 
/lo; p.213/ 
Naturally, central efforts aiming at reducing regional dif-
ferences are - primarily - directed to the "planned" proces- 
ses. Consequently, the formation of new regional differences 
• 
in numerous essential /not planned/ components of public 
health care took. place as a spontaneous process, reaching 
immense extents in several cases also at present. For instance, 
in psychiatric care there were 6.9 times more inhabitants 
per one specialist workin7 in a dispensary in Somogy county 
in 1082 than in Baranya county. /At the same time, this value 
was '1.6 times •rcater than the country-side average./ Or, 
considering the number of casualty surgery hods per ten 
thousand inhabitants, there was a /1.1.-fold difference  Lot-
ween Fej6r county /in the hest position/ and it .1(6s eounty 
/in the worst/ in 1980. 
Peculiar Social Relations Within the Practitioner's Stratum 
Social conditions of doctors represent one of the most im-
portant factors affecting the supply of physicians to in-
dividual settlements and counties. One of the essential com-
ponents in this respect has been the place of .individual ins- 
titutions, fields of specialization, and the settlements in 
the system of doctor's values.  particularly unfavourable 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 33- 
place in this system of values is to be engaged by a village 
or as a district practitioner. This situation has deep his-
torical roots. Its economic basis was manifested in the  bad 
living conditions for village doctors in the past /i,e.before 
1945/. At present, this  basis  can be characterized by the 
lower level of the urbanization of the settlements in ques-
tion and the essentially harder working conditions for the 
rural practitioners than for doctors working in towns. 
One of the major problems embodied in the moderation of 
regional differences in public health is the fact that in 
the past decades there were no efficient central incentives 
operating against the spontancousprocesses increasing 
inequalities in the supply of settlements with physicians. 
A  survey  on the social conditions of doctors made by a 
group of sociologists suggests that the physician's professio-
nal career and their choice  or  settlement  is  basically influ-
°need by social stratum and settlement they originally comp 
from. "According to our data we can conclude: tho hi;Ther 
the proportion  or  those  in a  settlement-typo attending the 
university of  medicine, then working in public health, the 
more probable is the supply of physicians to the given sot7.- 
lemont." /4; p.71/ 
Accordingly, processes outside the sphere of public health 
- among others the prospect of equality in the choice of 
future profession, the quicker urbanization of rural settle-
ments, etc. - also play a basic role in the moderation of 
regional differences in the supply of physicians. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
_ 314 - 
SUMMARY 
In Part One we outlined those tensions and contradictions 
whose solution is today in progress in Ilungarian public 
health. 
The study basically aimed at describing the main tendencies 
in regional differences of public health infrastructure and 
of the underlying factors. 
The. joint effect of the following major processes were

 primarily responsible for the regional differences in pub-
lic health infrastructure: /a/ changes in the stat.•  of 
health o1' the population; /b/ demographic  pcurcsscs  and 
their regional ciutracteristics; /r/ goals n 
(lov- 
lopment policy and  the  exaggerated emphasis on tohlts in 
the real pro .cesses in the seventies; /d/ regional charac_ 
teristics of the development of infrastructu•0  branches 
/e.g. transport, communication, etc./ representing the con-
ditions for  the  functioning of public health;  /e/ targets 
of public health policy; /f/ intended or spontaneous  regio-
nal effects of the main targets of  this polic.; /g/ volume 
and distribution mechanism of resources  dovotod t() 
development of public health; /h/ chan  ing 
uir;Ition 
public health influenced by the compromises b•theen the 
State administration and public heal th; 
peculiar s,r 
relations within the stratum of physicians. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 35 - 
Among the processes in the regional differences were em-
phasized: /a/ moderation of regional differences in the supply 
of physicians and the supply of hospital beds at different 
rates; /b/ cumulative and stabilizing disadvantageous provi-
sion in a group of counties and - partially - a parallel, 
unfavourable change in mortality; /c/ peculiar relation 
between the regional differences and adjustment to the so-
cial needs. 
Our study also illustrates - among others - that numerous 
problems in the development of public health are summa- 
rized in the trend of regional differences. Therefore, only 
the establishment of central programs is not sufficient to 
moderate the differences in question /though such programs 
also would be desirable/. 
Changes of vital importance could be realized through the 
increase of resources devoted to public health, the empha-
sized  development of primary care and reform of planning, 
management and financing of public health. 
Finally, we stre s s again, that our study - in a one-sided 
way - is concerned with the problems and conflicts of 
Hungarian public health and their regional differences. 
We are convinced that this approach is more adequate in 
the present "path-searching" stage of the development of 
Hungarian public health than the summarization  of results. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 36- 
Moreover,  scientific research can primarily contribute to 
the improvement  of public health care also by adopting 
such an approach. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 37  - 
REFERENCES 
/1/ ADAM, Gyorgy /1984/ Az orvosi halap4nz koriili vitahoz 
/On the Debates about Gratitude-money/. Tarsadalmi 
Szemle, No. 7-8. 135-144.p. 
/2/ /198o/ Adatok a magyarorszagi halalozasok nemzetkozi  
osszehasonlitasahoz /Data for International Compari-
son of Mortality in Hungary/. /Budapest, Egeszseg-
Ugyi Miniszt6rium/ 
/3/ BALOG, Janos - BODNAR, tva /1982/ A maayarorszagi halam-
dosag nehany jellegzetess6ge /Some Peculiarities 
of Mortality in Hungary/. N4peg4szs4gugy, No.2. 
141-153.p. 
/4/  BANLAKY, Pal - KtRESZ, GyulanA - SOLYMOSI, Zsuzsa /1981/ 
Orvosok Magyarorszagon /Physicians in Hungary/. 
/Budapest, Akad4miai Kiad6/ 
/5/  CSAKANY, Gyorgy  /1978/ Korszerti medicina - magyar egtSsz-
s4gagy /Up-to-date Medicine - Hungarian Public Health/. 
Valosa , No. 11. 41-53. p. 
/6/  CSASZI, Lajos /1982/ Pszichoszomatikus orvoslas /Psycho- 
somatic Treatment/. Valosag, No. 12. 83-91.p. 
/7/ ENYEDI, GyOrgy  /1981/ A magyar telepul4shalozat  Atalaku-
Iasi tendenciai /Transformation Trends in the Hungarian 
Settlement Network/. Magyar Tudomany, No. 11.  727 - 734.p 
/8/ GOSZTONYI, GyOrgy  /198o/ Egeszsegiigyi gondok as javasla-
tok /Public Health Problems and Proposals/. Vali:556.g, 
No.  7.  35-48. p. 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 3 8- 
/9/  GREFF, Lajos /1981/ A fekv5beteg gyOgyintezeti 6gyak 
strukturAja m6dositAsanak sziiksegesse5rer51 /On the 
necessity of Modifying In-patient Bed Structure/. 
Nepegeszsegugy,  No. 2.  7o-74. p. 
/lo/ HAJNAL, Albert  /1983/ Az egeszsegiigy nepgazdasAgi ter-
vezese: szemleletek es modellsemAk /Planning of 
Public Health on National Level: Views and Model 
Schedules/.  Egeszsegiigyi GazdasAgi Szemle,  No. 2. 
2o7-216. p. 
/11/ LEVENDEL, LAsz16  /1975/ Az orveslAsr61. /A tobb dimenzios 
orvoslAs es az egeszsegUgy/ /On Treatment. Multidi-
mensional Treatment and Public Health/.  ValOsAg,  
No. 1. 49-61. p. 
/12/ LEVENDEL, LAsz16  /1978/ Feszultsegek az egeszs6giigyben. 
/Az egeszseghr:y demokratizmusa/ /Tensions in Public 
Health. Democratism of Public Health/. Valosam, 
No. 1.  52-63. p. 
/13/  LEVENDEL, Lasz16  /1982/ A n6pegeszsegiigyi reformr61. 
/A reform's7iiks6gossege 6s  eselye/  /On Public Health 
Reform. Its Necessity and Chance/. ValOsAF , , No.  5. 
65 76.  p. 
-
/14/ LUKACS, Jen6 - KERESZTES, Laszlo - GAL, Gyorgy - 
VIDORVSZKY, KAlmAn  /1985/  Az eges.zsegagy fejlodese a 
Magyar NepkOztArsasAgban /Development of Public 
Health in the Hungarian People's Republic/. In: 
Szocializmus es egeszsegthry,  Ed: Sz.J. CSIKIN. 
/Budapest, Medicina Konyvkiad6/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
- 39- 
/15/ MONIGL, Istvan /198o/  Nepesedes es nepesedespolitika 
Magyarorszagon  /Population Growth and Demographic 
POlicy in Hungary/. /Budapest, MSZMP Politikai 
Fiiiskola/ 
'16/ OPOSZ, tva /1984/ A falusi korzeti orvosok szolgalat 
targyi felteteleinek kulonsegei Bacs-Kiskun megye-
ben// Differences in Material Conditions for Village 
District Practitioner Activity in Bacs-Kiskun County/ 
Egeszsegiigyi Gazdasagi Szemle, 
 No. 3. 299-323. p. 
/17/ SZALA1, Julia /1984/ Hiany es tarsadalmi szelekciO 
/Shortage and Social Selection/.  Valesag. 
 No.8. 
6o-7o.p. 
/18/ S7EPEST, :tndras - KAZAR, GyOrgy /1977/ MagyarorsiAg terii-
leti traumatolegiai agyellatottsa5m /Regional Trau-
matologival Bed Provision in Hungary/. 
%4or6szsegiigy, 
 No. 4. 244-2!Ih. p. 
N)//1 0 S4/ .- oeio.1  Expenditures: Erosion or Evolution? 
OECD Ohserver 
 No. 126. 
\'A((, 
/1982/  Versenrr6s a fejIeszt(.si forrAsok6rt.  
clusvtA 
 - trirsadalmi egyenitlense ,, ck 
•or Dc.:elopmental Resources. Regio-
nal Ditribution - Social Inequalities/. /Dudapest, 
Jogi Ktinyvkiad6/ 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
APPENDIX 

• 
• 
• 
▪ 
Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health 
• 
with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.


tt1 
CU 
C  CO 
4.1 

—I 0, 
••-
cc, 
0. 
CA 
4.1 

OC 
A. " 
.0 CU 
• .• 
'0 
".• 
r: 
0. 
 
MMISM ISS OO O OO O OO O 
d on 
 
(Base
ber 

• 
0,  
 num

the 
r' 
ra 

hi 
\\. 
C* 
.-, • 

a' 
0,) 
hi 


tA (1.1 
CO 
1.) 
ta 
ki.4 
`.) 

c,\:\ 
•••\", 
S. 
r • I  
hi 


• 
Oa •••• 

• 
1.4 
(,) 
O
.1: 
1 ) 

s.1  
C`. 0 
C. 
r'•• 
:f ) 
11 
A  1  
ll 
I : 
1 4 
‘.. 
sl 
.": 
Oa 
75 

I..... 
ro 
 we
•••• 
.c.1 

.1.-1 
ra 

.1 
C. 
t  : 

'3C 
C/1 
hirt 
hi 
.0 
0. 

 
...4 
.fl C.C. 
(.1 14 .Y 

IC 
In 
hi 
 as 
7 t0 
0E 
•c, 
CU 
t.4 
1., 
.--, "'II  
7..)  13 1.7 

c!  >, 
tn 0  :... 
{.. 
i  a)  0"C) 
0 E C 0 0 .-. 10 ut l` 

ds 
M C /.. I 
/4 LT 0:1 
C. 
 3. 
tit 'V C  7 3  at .0 4.,  , 
u) 0., i...  W to 

ies: 
V rtt 10 5.1 10 0 C 
Na) 
U .se 0  .,1.  03 tO 03 0 
I+ E 0 ,  :... 11 

be
t
0) w  1   0 E E . ul  03 
hi 
13  ,0.1 t0  MI 0 N N N .C: 0  at .0 0 '0  
n
hi CC1 NV. 4.: CO 

al a)  >. 0 0 0  M  a) ra 
u
I.. 

0:1  C.. C.:  :t0 t./1  E. > ".-...  C4 
‘31:3 cli CI 
Co
7.1. 
tAl 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table 1 
Mortality 
 
Infant mortality 
Age-standardized 
Counties 
rates/per l000 
mortality rates 
live births/ 
/  0 /oo / 
198o-1983 
1983 
1. Baranya 
19.8 
14.8 
2. Fejer 
18.8 
14.6 
3. Gyor-Sopron 
18.2 
13.7 
4. Kom6rom 
18.o 
15.7 
5. Somogy 
21.6 
15.o 
6. Tolna 
21.6 
14.3 
7. Vas 
17.3 
13.4 
8. Veszprem 
2o.1 
14.0 
9. Zala 
22.1 
13.6 
lo. Bacs-Kiskun 
19.5 
14.6 
11. Bekes 
20.2 
13.2 
12. Csongr6d 
16.6 
13.2 
13. Hajdu-Bihar 
17.6 
13.6 
14. Pest 

25.9 
14.6 
15. Szabolcs-Szatmar 
21.5 
14.7 
16. Szolnok • 
2o.1 
14.2 
17. Borsod-A.-Z. 
18.6 
14.2 
18. Heves 
23.6 
13.9 
119. NOgrad 
21.9 
13.5 
2o. Budapest 
22.9 
12.9 
National average 
2o.8 
13.9 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to 
Table) 2 
Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Physicians - per lo,000 population 
196o 
197o 
198o 
1984 
Counties 
MX=loo 
M=loo 
M=loo 
M=loo 
Baranya 
18.2 
95 
27.1 
loo 
33.1 
99 
35.6  99 
Fej6r 
9.9 
52 
14.5 
54  18.6 
56 
19.8  55 
GyOr-Sopron 
11.2 
58 
14.5 
54  19.8 
59 
22.3 
62 
KomArom 
12.4 
65 
15.9 
59 
19.7 
59 
21.2 
65 
Somogv 
9.1 
47 
14.2 
52  19.3 
58 
21.o  58 
Tolna 
8.9 
46 
16.6 
61 
2o.9 
63 
22.3  62 
Vas 
11.7 
61 
16.5 
61 
2o.2 
61 
22.6 
63 
Veszpr4m 
11.o 
57 
14.9 
55 
2o.o 
6o 
22.3  62 
Zala 
8.7 
45 
14.5 
54  21.8 
65 
23.7  66 
Bacs-Kiskun 
8.9 
46 
13.3 
49  18.5 
56 
2o.6  57 
B4k6s 
8.5 
44 
12.8 
47  16.2 
49 
18.4  51 
Csongrad 
19.2  loo 
25.5 
94 
33.3 
loo 
35.9  loo 
Hajdu-Bihar 
14.8 
77 
2o.5 
76  26.3 
79 
28.9 
81 
Pest 
7.4 
39 
11.6 
43  15.5 
47  17.2  48 
Szabolcs-Sz. 
6.8 
35 
lo.o 
37 
13.8 
41  15.9  44 
Szolnok 
9.o 
47 
14.0 
52  17.5 
53 
2o.2  56 
Borsod-A.-Z. 
1o.4 
54 
15.1 
56  18.1 
54 
19.9-  55 
Hoves 
lo.3 
54 
15.8 
58 
2o.3 
61 
21.8 
61 
NOgrad 
10.4 
54 
15.o 
55 
18.5 
56 
21.3  59 
County 
average 
lo.7 
56 
15.6 
58 
2o.2 
61 
22.3 
62 
Budapest 
35.7  186 
39.1 
144  45.8 
138  47;5  132 
National 
average 
15.3 
8o 
2o.2 
75 
25.1 
75 
27.2  76 
X  the value of the county with the best position equals loo 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table  3 
Specialists 
per lo,000 population 

196o 
197o 
198o 
1984 
Counties 
Mx =loo 
M=loo 
M=loo 
M=loo 
1. Baranya 
lo.5 
90 
17.4 
loo 
24.3  loo 
27.1  99 
2. Fej6r 
5.6 
48 
8.7 
5o 
12.7 
52  14.1 
52 
3. Gy6r-Sopron 
8.1 
69 
8.8 
51 
13.9 
57  16.6 
61 
4. KomArom 
6.5 
56 
9.7 
56 
12.o 
49 
14.6 
53 
5. Somogy 
4.6 
39 
8.3 
48 
13.1 
54 
15.7 
58 
6. Tolna 
4.7 
4o 
9.2 
53 
13.7 
56 
16.4 
6o 
7. Vas 
6.2 
53 
9.1 
52 
14.1 
58 
16.3 
6o 
8. Veszpr4m 
6.5 
56 
lo.1 
58 
14.1 
58 
16.o 
59 
9. Zala 
3.7 
32 
6.9 
4o 
14.4 
59 
17.6 
64 
10. BAcs-Kiskun 
4.8 
41 
7.6 
44 
11.9 
49 
14.7 
54 
1. Bekes 
4.5 
38 
7.o 
4o 
10.4 
43 
11.8  43 
12. Csongrad 
11,7  loo 
16.5 
95 
23.6 
97 
27.3  loo 
13. Hajdu-Bihar 
8.5 
73 
12.8 
74 
17.o 
7o 
2o.1  74 
14. Pest 
4.4 
38 
6.4 
37 
lo.9 
45 
12.6 
46 
15. Szabolcs-Sz.  2.8 
22 
4.5 
26 
7.o 
29 
9.5 
35 
16. Szolnok 
4.9 
42 
7.8 
45 
11.1 
46 
13.3  49 
17. Borsod A.
Z. 
5.4 
46 
8.4 
48 
11.6 
48 
13.3 
49 
-
-
18.  Heves 
5.3 
45 
8.6 
49 
13.o 
53 
15.5 
57 
19. /Therad 
5.5 
47 
8.3 
48 
11.0 
45 
13.6 
5o 
County average 
5.8 
9.1 
52 
13.4 
55 
15.8 
58 
2o. Budapest 
28.o 
239 
3o.o 
172 
37.1  153 
39.1  143 
National average 
9.8 
84 
13.1 
75 
18.o 
74 
2o.3 
74 
• 
x the value of the county with the best position equals loo 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table  4 
Regional differences of the supply 
of specialist X 
 
Standard  deviation /%/  Relative value xx 
Specialities 
 of the county with 
the worst position 
1970 
1981 
1970 
1981 
Internal medicine 
44.2 
31.3 
15 
3o 
Surgery 
30.6 
33.2 
28 
29 
Obstetrics and 
gynaecology 
31.1 
26.6 
32 
37 
Neonatology and 
Paediatrics 
32.8 
31.4 
28 
31 
Psychiatry and 
neurology 
50.1 
35.7 
16 
25 
Radiology 
46.7 
43.2 
22 
25 
Urology 
68.8 
43.2 

23 
All the specialitie 
34.0 
30.5 
26 
29 
Number of specialists per lo,000 population - 
data of the counties without tha capital /Budapest/ 
xx  the value of the county with  the  best position equals lo 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table  5 
Hospital beds x 
 - per lo,000 population 
Counties 
1961 
1971 
1980 
1984 
_xx =, 


ioo 
M=loa 
M=loo 
M=loo 
1. Baranya 
62.7 
61 
74.2 
81  89.2  94 
94.o  89 
2. Fejer 
44.8 
44 
54.4 
59 
59.5  63 
68.8 
65 
3. Gy6r-Sopron 
63.6 
62 
68.5 
74  78.4  82 
82.2  78 
4. KomArom 
62.2 
6o 
7o.1  76  77.5  81 
83.8  79 
5. Somogy 
46.4 
45 
63.8 
69  78.9 
83 
80.1  76 
6. Tolna 
45.5 
44 
74.8 
81 
78.9 
83 
81.2 
77 
7. Vas 
1o2.9 
loo  90.8 
99 
94.3  99 
97.4  92 
8. Veszprem 
52.4 
51 
55.7 
61  73.5  77 
79.3  75 
9. Zala 
35.1 
34 
62.7 
68  76.4  8o 
79.3  75 
lo.  B6cs-K. 
39.9 
39 
54.3 
59 
73.7  77 
74.o  7o 
11.  136kes 
'49.6 
48 
55.7  61  63.4  67 
7o.6  67 
12.  Cson ,7rAd 
186.5 
R4 
87.6 
95 
89.8  94 
91.9 
87 
13.  Hajdu B. 
-
55.5 
54 
62.9 
68 
64.7  68 
7o.5 
67 
14.  Pest 
2o.8 
2o 
26.8 
29 
42.1  44 
46.4  44 
11.  Szabolcs-Sz. 
35.3 
34 
55. 0 
 
61  69.o  72 
70.4 
67 
16.  Szolnok 

4o.2 
39 
57.6 
63  69.8  73 
80.5  76 
17.  Borsod A.Z: 
52.7 
51 
73.7 
-
8o 
77.4  -81 
80.1 
76 
18. Heves 
71.1 
69 
92.o  loo 
95.2  loo 
Lol.;  loo 
19. NOgrad 
66.6 
65 
82.8 
90 
87.5 
92 
89.6 
85 
County  average 
50.7 
49 
62.8 
68 
75.7 
8o 
76.0 
73 
2o. Budapest 
143.5 
139  129.5  141  137.2  .144 
136.6  120 
National average 
67.8 
66  75.8  82 
87.5 
92 
88.4, 
WI 
actual beds, without beds in national sanatoria 
xx  the value of - the county with the best position equal 

Orosz, Éva: Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian Public Health with Special Regard 
to Spatial Differences. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, 1986. 3-47. p. Discussion Papers, No. 1.
Table 6 

Relative scores
of health expenditures 
per person/ 
Total 
Hospital 
Counties 
expenditures 
expenditures 
1972 
198o 
1972 
198o 
1. Baranya 
loo 
loo 
95 
97 
2. Fej4r 
65 
63 
54 
57 
3.  Gy6r- Sopron 
73 
71 
67 
67 
4. Kometrom 
83 
78 
72 
68 
5. Somogy 
77 
8o 
.. 68 
76 
6. Tolna 
90 
81 
90 
74 
7.  Vas 
94 
87 
93 
83 
8. Veszpr4m 
7o 
73 
62 
64' 
9.  Zala. 
74 
71 
67 
65 
lo. BAes-Kiskun 
67 
7o 
54 
62 
11. B4k4s 
66 
67 
59 
55 
12.  Csongretd 
9 8 
 
96 
loo 
loo 
13.  Hajdu-Bihar 
85 
77 
77 
7o 
14. Post 
74 
80 
76 
85 
15.  Szaboles-Sz. 
65 
66 
57 
6o 
16. Szolnok 
67 
66 
52 
57 
17. Borscid-A.Z. 
79 
77 
75 
76 
1B. Heves 
82 
76 
74 
73 
19. NOgrAd 
93 
91 
91 
88 
County average 
75 
77 
68 
73 
2o. Budapest 
log 
95 
98 
89 
National. average 
83 
8o 
74 
76 
the  score  of the county with the best position is loo 




Discussion Papers 1986. No. 1. 
Critical Issues in the Development of Hungarian 
Public Health with Special Regard to Spatial Differences
The Discussion Papers series of the Centre for Regional 
Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences was launches 
in 1986 to publish summaries of research findings on reg 
nal and urban development. 
The series has  3  or  4  issues a year. It will be of inte-
rest to geographers, economists, sociologists, experts o: 
law and political sciences, historians and everybody els 
who is, in one way or another, engaged in the research o: 
spatial aspects of socio-economic development and planni: 
The series is published by the Centre for Regional Studi 
Individual copies are available on request at the Centre 
Postal address: 
MTA Regionalis KutatAsok 
Centre for Regional Studies 
Kozpontja . 
Hungarian Academy of 
H-76o1 PtCS 
Sciences 
pf.199 
P.O. Box 199 
76o1 PiCS 
Phone: /72/ 12  755 
Telex: 12 475 
Director general: GyOrgy ENYEDI 
Editor: Laszlo HRUBI 

x x 
Forthcoming in  the Discussion Papers series: 
Environmental Policy in Hungary 
by 
G;tirgy Enyedi and ViOla Zentai